The Prague Post - Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk

EUR -
AED 4.109274
AFN 78.314666
ALL 98.397081
AMD 432.900753
ANG 2.00226
AOA 1025.922471
ARS 1273.264389
AUD 1.746459
AWG 2.013806
AZN 1.922366
BAM 1.955007
BBD 2.260584
BDT 136.024847
BGN 1.954732
BHD 0.421548
BIF 3283.623349
BMD 1.118781
BND 1.455175
BOB 7.735967
BRL 6.356888
BSD 1.119596
BTN 95.665487
BWP 15.171527
BYN 3.664078
BYR 21928.11504
BZD 2.248969
CAD 1.562434
CDF 3210.902409
CHF 0.935323
CLF 0.027388
CLP 1051.005439
CNY 8.063033
CNH 8.061312
COP 4698.881794
CRC 567.995086
CUC 1.118781
CUP 29.647707
CVE 110.843266
CZK 24.934843
DJF 198.829801
DKK 7.459476
DOP 65.952347
DZD 148.913177
EGP 56.111591
ERN 16.781721
ETB 148.582746
FJD 2.543941
FKP 0.841177
GBP 0.841139
GEL 3.065668
GGP 0.841177
GHS 13.884243
GIP 0.841177
GMD 80.552287
GNF 9683.616935
GTQ 8.601512
GYD 234.235027
HKD 8.733129
HNL 29.032565
HRK 7.53589
HTG 146.337206
HUF 402.470475
IDR 18482.044634
ILS 3.978443
IMP 0.841177
INR 95.588737
IQD 1465.603607
IRR 47100.696195
ISK 144.680499
JEP 0.841177
JMD 178.467639
JOD 0.793553
JPY 162.983665
KES 144.887419
KGS 97.837332
KHR 4495.264022
KMF 492.834098
KPW 1006.85955
KRW 1564.044831
KWD 0.343879
KYD 0.933034
KZT 571.743733
LAK 24188.053236
LBP 100242.811343
LKR 334.179439
LRD 223.309998
LSL 20.171951
LTL 3.303471
LVL 0.676739
LYD 6.176799
MAD 10.39425
MDL 19.503354
MGA 5073.673251
MKD 61.551031
MMK 2348.935324
MNT 3999.804794
MOP 9.004649
MRU 44.32589
MUR 51.329962
MVR 17.296474
MWK 1942.204225
MXN 21.797887
MYR 4.791186
MZN 71.492617
NAD 20.305897
NGN 1791.828671
NIO 41.126165
NOK 11.656639
NPR 153.064779
NZD 1.904904
OMR 0.430553
PAB 1.119561
PEN 4.122149
PGK 4.548978
PHP 62.424057
PKR 315.053432
PLN 4.24695
PYG 8938.375852
QAR 4.073475
RON 5.10477
RSD 117.197719
RUB 89.501511
RWF 1589.78834
SAR 4.196374
SBD 9.346708
SCR 16.222445
SDG 671.809547
SEK 10.880316
SGD 1.451959
SHP 0.879187
SLE 25.393737
SLL 23460.286378
SOS 639.869156
SRD 40.658192
STD 23156.515747
SVC 9.79651
SYP 14545.677413
SZL 20.305891
THB 37.199151
TJS 11.593199
TMT 3.921329
TND 3.375919
TOP 2.620304
TRY 43.417069
TTD 7.603189
TWD 33.766167
TZS 3012.521361
UAH 46.433156
UGX 4086.343154
USD 1.118781
UYU 46.643173
UZS 14516.188123
VES 105.208003
VND 29029.579847
VUV 134.312142
WST 3.093872
XAF 655.720437
XAG 0.034283
XAU 0.000345
XCD 3.023563
XDR 0.821899
XOF 645.536963
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.11901
ZAR 20.18897
ZMK 10070.373934
ZMW 29.899278
ZWL 360.247148
  • RBGPF

    0.8100

    63.81

    +1.27%

  • BCC

    0.2500

    90.99

    +0.27%

  • CMSC

    0.1350

    22.1

    +0.61%

  • BCE

    0.3700

    21.63

    +1.71%

  • BTI

    0.8200

    41.37

    +1.98%

  • SCS

    -0.0400

    10.5

    -0.38%

  • NGG

    2.6000

    70.03

    +3.71%

  • GSK

    1.3500

    37.57

    +3.59%

  • CMSD

    0.1200

    22.38

    +0.54%

  • RIO

    0.7200

    62.75

    +1.15%

  • JRI

    0.1035

    12.74

    +0.81%

  • RYCEF

    0.2600

    10.79

    +2.41%

  • AZN

    1.7300

    67.96

    +2.55%

  • RELX

    0.9800

    54.04

    +1.81%

  • VOD

    0.2300

    9.27

    +2.48%

  • BP

    -0.2500

    30.11

    -0.83%

Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk
Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk / Photo: Ronan LIETAR - AFP/File

Debris falling from the sky: more often, more risk

It is still not clear what exactly fell onto a Kenyan village last month, but such events are likely to become increasingly common given the amount of space debris drifting above the planet.

Text size:

- What we know

A metallic ring of roughly 2.5 metres (8 feet) in diameter and weighing some 500 kilogrammes (1,100 pounds), crashed into Mukuku village, in Makueni county, in the south of the country on December 30.

The Kenya Space Agency (KSA) has opened an investigation and is examining the possibility that it might have been the separation ring from a rocket.

Other theories have already surfaced however, and a KSA spokesman has said they have not ruled out anything.

- The theories being examined

It is not even certain that what crashed in Kenya came from outer space.

But for Romain Lucken who runs Aldoria, a French start-up that tracks debris in space, it is "absolutely plausible" that it did.

He said he thought it might be part of the upper stage of a Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) developed by India's space agency.

"There is a mission that was sent up on December 30 with a return date that fits well, and most of all, a point of re-entry that fits very well, to within a few dozen kilometres," he told AFP.

Aldoria, which has 15 telescopes around the world, searches for information on launches and then works out flight paths based on "the typical trajectories of each of the main launch sites".

But Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, is not convinced.

It was McDowell who identified a piece of the International Space Station (ISS) that crashed down on a house in Florida last April.

"I do not believe this object came from space. Maybe fell off an airplane," he told AFP. "Give me evidence it is space debris."

He has not however entirely ruled out that it is part of an Ariane 5 V184 launch in 2008 that finally returned to earth.

But the French aerospace group told AFP: "This piece does not belong to an element from a European launcher operated by Arianespace."

John Crassidis at New York's SUNY, which works with NASA on space debris, endorsed the assessment released by the Kenya Space Agency.

"I think their technical assessments are 100 percent accurate, and they're going to figure out what country it came from, because every country does things a little bit differently," he said.

While it could be a separation ring from a rocket, as the KSA was considering, it might also have come from the upper stage of a rocket. "Those tend to be smaller," he told AFP.

Christophe Bonnal, a French specialist in space debris, said the debris might have come from a military launcher.

"They are armoured, which fits with the fact that it is very big and heavy," he said. But then it could also have come from a digger or a tank, he added.

- Assessing the risk

So far, at least, such incidents have not caused any deaths, but since the number of space launches is rising, so too are the risks.

"Ten years ago, an object that might create impact fragments re-entered the atmosphere every two weeks," said Stijn Lemmens, a specialist in debris at the European Space Agency (ESA). "Now, that can happen twice a week."

For Lucken, at Aldoria, it is just a question of time.

"It's going to end up falling on critical infrastructure, like a nuclear power station, an oil tanker or homes," he warned.

"It's our Sword of Damocles," said Christophe Bonnal, referring to the parable of the sword suspended by a thread over a ruler's head.

But geography plays in our favour, he added, given that 71 percent of the planet is covered by ocean and 10 percent by deserts. Only 3.3 percent of Earth is densely populated, he said.

So far, said Lucken, about 30,000 pieces of debris measuring more than 10 centimetres have been identified orbiting the earth, and more than a million larger than one centimetre.

All of them were potentially dangerous, he added.

And that catalogue is not an exhaustive list, Bonnal pointed out, since it does not include various military objects launched into space.

"If it's a piece of a US missile, we'll probably never know," he said.

In Europe, said Lucken, there are rules obliging operators to ensure controlled re-entries in uninhabited zones, such as in the South Pacific -- or to be sure such objects would be completely destroyed.

"But that's the theory. Once the mission is launched, anything can happen."

And no one is going to be chasing them to pay out compensation if something goes wrong, he added.

And, as another observer noted, part of the problem lies elsewhere.

China is by far the worst offender, said Crassidis.

"We have these rules, but China and Russia don't really follow any rules."

burs-tsz-agu-tq-neo/jj/gv

M.Soucek--TPP