The Prague Post - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

EUR -
AED 4.210499
AFN 72.796213
ALL 94.461752
AMD 422.020011
ANG 2.052384
AOA 1052.326771
ARS 1679.881759
AUD 1.63659
AWG 2.066251
AZN 1.953303
BAM 1.955297
BBD 2.308106
BDT 140.663801
BGN 1.938299
BHD 0.432188
BIF 3421.780125
BMD 1.146325
BND 1.479519
BOB 7.918997
BRL 5.906215
BSD 1.146005
BTN 108.029372
BWP 15.573585
BYN 3.184181
BYR 22467.97
BZD 2.304717
CAD 1.624933
CDF 2613.621415
CHF 0.926076
CLF 0.026285
CLP 1034.512913
CNY 7.760166
CNH 7.776084
COP 3957.893401
CRC 519.866215
CUC 1.146325
CUP 30.377613
CVE 110.510194
CZK 24.17726
DJF 203.72533
DKK 7.470032
DOP 66.949832
DZD 152.856753
EGP 57.300762
ERN 17.194875
ETB 181.549268
FJD 2.562614
FKP 0.86629
GBP 0.867794
GEL 3.038209
GGP 0.86629
GHS 12.867544
GIP 0.86629
GMD 84.259302
GNF 10059.002282
GTQ 8.74175
GYD 239.719355
HKD 8.983611
HNL 30.589728
HRK 7.535022
HTG 149.691478
HUF 351.715881
IDR 20434.733348
ILS 3.402911
IMP 0.86629
INR 108.133415
IQD 1501.68575
IRR 1576196.875404
ISK 143.898619
JEP 0.86629
JMD 181.073402
JOD 0.81279
JPY 184.907999
KES 148.338813
KGS 100.246562
KHR 4596.763652
KMF 492.350937
KPW 1031.692901
KRW 1751.183826
KWD 0.352988
KYD 0.954929
KZT 559.241447
LAK 25282.198275
LBP 102653.40415
LKR 382.461576
LRD 208.803536
LSL 18.805507
LTL 3.3848
LVL 0.6934
LYD 7.307867
MAD 10.574893
MDL 20.237262
MGA 4814.565397
MKD 61.595297
MMK 2406.686258
MNT 4104.327632
MOP 9.251919
MRU 45.922214
MUR 54.852085
MVR 17.711155
MWK 1991.16692
MXN 19.883752
MYR 4.743383
MZN 73.262063
NAD 18.804002
NGN 1559.506815
NIO 41.96739
NOK 11.122344
NPR 172.851518
NZD 1.99898
OMR 0.441315
PAB 1.14601
PEN 3.879208
PGK 5.029788
PHP 69.600846
PKR 319.05095
PLN 4.257165
PYG 7037.250395
QAR 4.173201
RON 5.236532
RSD 117.120453
RUB 83.800079
RWF 1678.2198
SAR 4.296702
SBD 9.241012
SCR 15.685465
SDG 688.372376
SEK 10.992483
SGD 1.481515
SHP 0.855847
SLE 28.371969
SLL 24037.866288
SOS 655.128936
SRD 42.875425
STD 23726.613079
STN 24.531355
SVC 10.02742
SYP 126.705707
SZL 18.803912
THB 37.703052
TJS 10.628811
TMT 4.012138
TND 3.337812
TOP 2.760076
TRY 53.257148
TTD 7.771034
TWD 36.355741
TZS 3015.963923
UAH 51.481152
UGX 4170.926637
USD 1.146325
UYU 45.818209
UZS 13761.632008
VES 695.398184
VND 30159.81075
VUV 135.418733
WST 3.154451
XAF 655.788237
XAG 0.017686
XAU 0.000276
XCD 3.098001
XCG 2.065269
XDR 0.806666
XOF 647.674005
XPF 119.331742
YER 273.517259
ZAR 18.861706
ZMK 10318.306372
ZMW 20.541803
ZWL 369.116182
  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.37

    +0.22%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    79.44

    -1.56%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.67

    +0.39%

  • BCC

    3.8500

    74.66

    +5.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.29

    0%

  • AZN

    -2.9600

    174.93

    -1.69%

  • GSK

    -1.4800

    50.67

    -2.92%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    58.91

    -0.98%

  • RIO

    -2.5900

    100.08

    -2.59%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    60.61

    -0.87%

  • RELX

    -0.8300

    31.18

    -2.66%

  • VOD

    -0.2300

    14.3

    -1.61%

  • BP

    -1.0400

    39.1

    -2.66%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    18.4

    -0.16%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: Simon Wohlfahrt - AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

P.Benes--TPP