The Prague Post - Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

EUR -
AED 4.362176
AFN 75.418589
ALL 96.494576
AMD 447.661832
ANG 2.12552
AOA 1089.047662
ARS 1661.777283
AUD 1.678519
AWG 2.137715
AZN 2.023668
BAM 1.958694
BBD 2.392195
BDT 145.254607
BGN 1.956777
BHD 0.447766
BIF 3521.292283
BMD 1.18762
BND 1.501231
BOB 8.207645
BRL 6.198786
BSD 1.187685
BTN 107.583839
BWP 15.664473
BYN 3.403829
BYR 23277.345275
BZD 2.388679
CAD 1.617532
CDF 2678.082756
CHF 0.911859
CLF 0.025954
CLP 1024.801648
CNY 8.204849
CNH 8.195716
COP 4351.937223
CRC 576.058377
CUC 1.18762
CUP 31.471921
CVE 110.809539
CZK 24.275663
DJF 211.064233
DKK 7.47037
DOP 73.959062
DZD 153.959497
EGP 55.636067
ERN 17.814295
ETB 184.323171
FJD 2.627062
FKP 0.871337
GBP 0.869635
GEL 3.17693
GGP 0.871337
GHS 13.081678
GIP 0.871337
GMD 87.294618
GNF 10427.301009
GTQ 9.109459
GYD 248.49283
HKD 9.284277
HNL 31.484258
HRK 7.537708
HTG 155.728115
HUF 379.250946
IDR 19987.638825
ILS 3.670612
IMP 0.871337
INR 107.568592
IQD 1556.37556
IRR 50028.478234
ISK 145.032571
JEP 0.871337
JMD 185.874622
JOD 0.842069
JPY 181.277675
KES 153.203352
KGS 103.857795
KHR 4776.606676
KMF 492.862574
KPW 1068.792645
KRW 1711.015971
KWD 0.36416
KYD 0.989783
KZT 587.745793
LAK 25468.503956
LBP 106351.340689
LKR 367.242585
LRD 221.376784
LSL 18.936642
LTL 3.506733
LVL 0.71838
LYD 7.494332
MAD 10.856078
MDL 20.167221
MGA 5219.588804
MKD 61.669907
MMK 2493.496044
MNT 4253.542783
MOP 9.565055
MRU 47.410226
MUR 54.54782
MVR 18.295327
MWK 2062.305972
MXN 20.376103
MYR 4.640629
MZN 75.90122
NAD 18.954857
NGN 1607.122996
NIO 43.597965
NOK 11.273753
NPR 172.124306
NZD 1.965469
OMR 0.456641
PAB 1.187795
PEN 3.982134
PGK 5.098497
PHP 68.728148
PKR 332.062852
PLN 4.209166
PYG 7789.508664
QAR 4.324421
RON 5.092161
RSD 117.410943
RUB 91.033374
RWF 1727.986601
SAR 4.453718
SBD 9.554617
SCR 16.079943
SDG 714.357589
SEK 10.583715
SGD 1.498543
SHP 0.891022
SLE 29.037741
SLL 24903.789624
SOS 678.728983
SRD 44.837438
STD 24581.329103
STN 24.76187
SVC 10.392354
SYP 13134.568542
SZL 18.931096
THB 36.939302
TJS 11.20627
TMT 4.156669
TND 3.377294
TOP 2.859503
TRY 51.935206
TTD 8.062013
TWD 37.239047
TZS 3087.811506
UAH 51.220176
UGX 4204.211541
USD 1.18762
UYU 45.787842
UZS 14429.579228
VES 466.413951
VND 30842.482489
VUV 141.712812
WST 3.208932
XAF 656.933122
XAG 0.015441
XAU 0.000236
XCD 3.209602
XCG 2.14049
XDR 0.816456
XOF 656.754064
XPF 119.331742
YER 283.069576
ZAR 18.934981
ZMK 10690.006312
ZMW 21.587258
ZWL 382.413045
  • RIO

    0.1600

    98.07

    +0.16%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.75

    +0.21%

  • NGG

    1.1800

    92.4

    +1.28%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    86.5

    -1.8%

  • CMSD

    0.0647

    23.64

    +0.27%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • BCE

    -0.1200

    25.71

    -0.47%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    17.1

    +1.35%

  • JRI

    0.2135

    13.24

    +1.61%

  • BTI

    -1.1100

    59.5

    -1.87%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    15.57

    -0.32%

  • RELX

    2.2500

    31.06

    +7.24%

  • BP

    0.4700

    37.66

    +1.25%

  • AZN

    1.0300

    205.55

    +0.5%

  • GSK

    0.3900

    58.93

    +0.66%

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate
Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate / Photo: Simon Wohlfahrt - AFP

Dutch windmill village churned by overtourism debate

With its historic windmills and gabled wooden houses nestling by a meandering river, the picture-perfect and TikTok-famous area of Zaanse Schans is a must-see for any visitor to the Netherlands.

Text size:

But the village of centuries-old buildings near Amsterdam has become "a national symbol of overtourism", according to local authorities, who now want to charge a hotly contested entrance fee.

The fierce debate over the 17.50-euro ($20) ticket planned for next year comes during a global backlash against mass tourism that has seen hotspots like Venice charge for day trips.

On a glorious summer day when AFP visited, long queues for the world-famous windmills snaked outside the doors and crowds shuffled over bridges, waiting in line for Instagram-ready snaps of the bucolic scenery.

Buses disgorge scores of day-tripping tourists all day long, packing into a relatively small area that is public and free to visit -- for now.

The council in nearby Zaanstad says the fee is vital to preserve the heritage buildings, which are coming under "severe pressure" from high tourist numbers.

"For several years now, the Zaanse Schans has been a national symbol of overtourism," said alderman Wessel Breunesse.

Around 2.6 million tourists visited last year, a figure set to rise to three million in coming years if nothing is done, the council says.

An entrance fee could reduce the annual volume to around 1.8 million and bring in millions of euros to preserve these historic buildings.

"Doing nothing is not an option. Without sufficient resources for adequate maintenance, the heritage will be lost in the short term (five to seven years)," said the council in a statement sent to AFP.

- Tourism-dependent economy -

What many tourists do not know until they arrive is that while many of the buildings date from the 16th century, the site itself is a recent and artificial oddity.

After World War II, traditional timber construction was in danger of dying out for good.

Eager to preserve this slice of history, local mayor Joris in 't Veld came up with a plan: he would uproot the houses and relocate them to a new protected site.

The first mill arrived in 1955, the first house a few years later. Eventually, the "Zaanse Schans" site was famous enough to be officially "opened" by Queen Juliana in 1972.

"The Zaanse Schans was never conceived as the international crowd-puller it is today, attracting millions of visitors from all over the world," noted alderman Breunesse.

But for local resident and businesswoman Ingrid Kraakman, the plan to charge an entrance fee would spell disaster, both as a citizen and for the cheese shop in which she works.

"As a resident from this area, I don't want to live behind a fence... that's not OK," the 62-year-old told AFP from her 17th-century home in the heart of Zaanse Schans.

Kraakman and her husband Ko have lived in the area for 33 years and believe an entrance fee would be a death blow for the local economy and jobs.

"There's a lot of fear," she said, estimating that around 80 percent of the local economy is dependent on tourism.

Her cheese shop is brimming with tourists, attracted by free samples and souvenirs, but she said the fee would be a major drag on spending.

A family of four would already be paying around 80 euros with parking, reducing their budget for on-site purchases, she noted.

"They don't buy cheese. They don't buy clocks. They buy a souvenir or maybe the smallest cheese there is," she told AFP.

- Referendum demand -

The Kraakmans have collected more than 2,000 signatures for a referendum on the issue, but their push has so far fallen on deaf ears in the town hall.

Aware of some local hostility, the council has pledged the site will stay free for locals and that there will be no physical fence around the area.

Although the plans are for next year, an amendment was introduced to allow for the possibility of delays. Now 2026 seems too short a deadline -- a "moonshot", said one local official on condition of anonymity.

Most tourists said the trip would be worth it even if they had to pay.

Spanish visitor Robert Duque told AFP: "It's a lovely place but sometimes it's too crowded and you don't really get to enjoy the full experience."

The 35-year-old operations manager said he would welcome the entrance fee to crimp tourist volumes.

"I think it's good, so we can stagger the arrival of guests and we can enjoy the facilities more," said Duque.

P.Benes--TPP