The Prague Post - US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws

EUR -
AED 4.324247
AFN 78.159677
ALL 96.383136
AMD 449.156415
ANG 2.108142
AOA 1079.738196
ARS 1707.873712
AUD 1.756
AWG 2.119737
AZN 2.004683
BAM 1.953035
BBD 2.371842
BDT 143.906264
BGN 1.955183
BHD 0.444171
BIF 3482.669398
BMD 1.177468
BND 1.511959
BOB 8.155419
BRL 6.501385
BSD 1.177633
BTN 105.803209
BWP 15.480018
BYN 3.437334
BYR 23078.372706
BZD 2.368437
CAD 1.610311
CDF 2590.430108
CHF 0.92851
CLF 0.027159
CLP 1065.420451
CNY 8.275831
CNH 8.252726
COP 4408.20468
CRC 588.1673
CUC 1.177468
CUP 31.202902
CVE 110.109113
CZK 24.255958
DJF 209.25926
DKK 7.469533
DOP 73.815495
DZD 152.411371
EGP 55.986841
ERN 17.66202
ETB 183.219828
FJD 2.671905
FKP 0.873155
GBP 0.872474
GEL 3.161474
GGP 0.873155
GHS 13.101396
GIP 0.873155
GMD 87.728137
GNF 10292.428455
GTQ 9.022227
GYD 246.370154
HKD 9.156244
HNL 31.041054
HRK 7.533201
HTG 154.191703
HUF 388.726923
IDR 19698.038712
ILS 3.751445
IMP 0.873155
INR 105.771538
IQD 1542.715894
IRR 49600.839466
ISK 148.005699
JEP 0.873155
JMD 187.844059
JOD 0.834827
JPY 183.703876
KES 151.834978
KGS 102.969522
KHR 4720.297177
KMF 492.181341
KPW 1059.742047
KRW 1700.793727
KWD 0.361706
KYD 0.981406
KZT 605.253111
LAK 25485.810144
LBP 105455.453235
LKR 364.543896
LRD 208.434024
LSL 19.599152
LTL 3.476757
LVL 0.712239
LYD 6.372977
MAD 10.744289
MDL 19.754948
MGA 5385.352798
MKD 61.564829
MMK 2472.481239
MNT 4186.07642
MOP 9.432805
MRU 46.632979
MUR 54.104464
MVR 18.192014
MWK 2042.000359
MXN 21.123411
MYR 4.762889
MZN 75.251308
NAD 19.599152
NGN 1707.858371
NIO 43.338643
NOK 11.782763
NPR 169.285334
NZD 2.018368
OMR 0.452732
PAB 1.177628
PEN 3.96269
PGK 5.0858
PHP 69.220404
PKR 329.88087
PLN 4.214723
PYG 7980.701292
QAR 4.292423
RON 5.092787
RSD 117.235767
RUB 93.019627
RWF 1715.164466
SAR 4.416323
SBD 9.600357
SCR 17.936864
SDG 708.237705
SEK 10.798895
SGD 1.512051
SHP 0.883406
SLE 28.347521
SLL 24690.91944
SOS 671.845979
SRD 45.138822
STD 24371.210202
STN 24.465363
SVC 10.304411
SYP 13019.121378
SZL 19.583275
THB 36.583609
TJS 10.822332
TMT 4.132913
TND 3.42605
TOP 2.835061
TRY 50.450028
TTD 8.010625
TWD 37.022301
TZS 2912.404656
UAH 49.679666
UGX 4250.981657
USD 1.177468
UYU 46.02484
UZS 14192.906339
VES 339.215383
VND 30990.957634
VUV 142.639112
WST 3.283512
XAF 655.026862
XAG 0.016367
XAU 0.000263
XCD 3.182166
XCG 2.122395
XDR 0.81366
XOF 655.029639
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.767028
ZAR 19.625447
ZMK 10598.620736
ZMW 26.58425
ZWL 379.144214
  • RBGPF

    1.0400

    81.26

    +1.28%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    0.2000

    15.56

    +1.29%

  • CMSC

    0.0100

    23.02

    +0.04%

  • VOD

    0.0400

    13.1

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2500

    77.49

    +0.32%

  • BTI

    0.2000

    57.24

    +0.35%

  • GSK

    0.1100

    48.96

    +0.22%

  • RIO

    -0.0800

    80.89

    -0.1%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    41.09

    -0.1%

  • BCE

    0.2800

    23.01

    +1.22%

  • JRI

    0.0600

    13.47

    +0.45%

  • CMSD

    0.1200

    23.14

    +0.52%

  • AZN

    0.3100

    92.45

    +0.34%

  • BP

    -0.2700

    34.31

    -0.79%

  • BCC

    1.4800

    74.71

    +1.98%

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws
US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws / Photo: Jim WATSON - AFP

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws

The US Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review a pair of Republican-backed laws that imposed restrictions on social media content moderation, in a decision welcomed by the tech industry.

Text size:

Tech industry trade groups had challenged the laws passed by conservative Republican lawmakers in Florida and Texas in a bid to stem what they claimed was political bias by major platforms.

The Supreme Court declined to rule on whether it was constitutional for states to pass legislation that limit the powers of social media companies to moderate their content, leaving the two laws in limbo as the lower courts conduct their review.

Florida's measure bars social media platforms from pulling content from politicians, a law that was passed after former president Donald Trump was suspended from Twitter and Facebook in the wake of the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.

In Texas, the law stops sites from pulling content based on a "viewpoint" and is also intended to thwart what conservatives see as censorship by tech platforms such as Facebook and YouTube against right-wing ideas.

Neither law has gone into effect due to the litigation.

The challenge was brought by associations representing big tech companies, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice, who argue that the First Amendment allows platforms to have the freedom to handle content as they see fit.

"We are encouraged that a majority of the Court has made clear that the government cannot tilt public debate in its favored direction," CCIA president Matt Schruers said in a statement.

"There is nothing more Orwellian than government attempting to dictate what speech should be carried, whether it is a newspaper or a social media site."

The decision was also welcomed by tech advocacy groups.

"The government does not have the right to impose rules on how companies like Meta and Google should accomplish" content moderation, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at the watchdog Free Press.

"These laws would have further ratcheted up the amount of hate and disinformation online while undermining both the meaning and the intent of the First Amendment," she added.

Monday's decision comes after the Supreme Court last week rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content.

The decision handed a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms including Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.

T.Kolar--TPP