The Prague Post - Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

EUR -
AED 4.180655
AFN 71.717881
ALL 91.589819
AMD 414.665361
ANG 2.038095
AOA 1045.02191
ARS 1725.834019
AUD 1.618368
AWG 2.049063
AZN 1.924187
BAM 1.957164
BBD 2.300782
BDT 140.457905
BGN 1.916376
BHD 0.43067
BIF 3432.757073
BMD 1.138368
BND 1.45966
BOB 13.623137
BRL 5.882179
BSD 1.142346
BTN 109.310953
BWP 15.534146
BYN 3.458935
BYR 22312.022383
BZD 2.29748
CAD 1.60523
CDF 2629.63073
CHF 0.938242
CLF 0.027773
CLP 1096.624192
CNY 7.639989
CNH 7.644423
COP 3743.866286
CRC 518.324868
CUC 1.138368
CUP 30.166765
CVE 110.335608
CZK 24.422487
DJF 203.422859
DKK 7.475865
DOP 67.954382
DZD 152.467342
EGP 58.539687
ERN 17.075527
ETB 186.592948
FJD 2.5508
FKP 0.854378
GBP 0.859639
GEL 2.976821
GGP 0.854378
GHS 13.233643
GIP 0.854378
GMD 84.239631
GNF 10046.56159
GTQ 8.71958
GYD 239.000294
HKD 8.927837
HNL 30.661891
HRK 7.534066
HTG 149.317359
HUF 365.41913
IDR 20377.93432
ILS 3.45373
IMP 0.854378
INR 109.105221
IQD 1496.543151
IRR 1564772.865519
ISK 138.00435
JEP 0.854378
JMD 179.986762
JOD 0.807067
JPY 179.769995
KES 147.430575
KGS 99.550101
KHR 4633.046275
KMF 492.913204
KPW 1024.532002
KRW 1561.568694
KWD 0.351972
KYD 0.952005
KZT 507.972842
LAK 25597.280192
LBP 101925.976202
LKR 375.830509
LRD 197.056104
LSL 18.63508
LTL 3.361306
LVL 0.688588
LYD 7.292763
MAD 10.935334
MDL 20.21965
MGA 5019.278181
MKD 61.567915
MMK 2390.092712
MNT 4095.762808
MOP 9.229233
MRU 45.738667
MUR 54.504917
MVR 17.587282
MWK 1980.793692
MXN 19.959129
MYR 4.646026
MZN 72.753363
NAD 18.634671
NGN 1508.861927
NIO 42.03764
NOK 10.806703
NPR 174.899462
NZD 2.005845
OMR 0.437698
PAB 1.142396
PEN 3.856688
PGK 5.089279
PHP 71.410212
PKR 316.572659
PLN 4.377527
PYG 6770.421884
QAR 4.164565
RON 5.274517
RSD 117.464813
RUB 96.53154
RWF 1686.093812
SAR 4.280343
SBD 9.107531
SCR 15.748274
SDG 684.725529
SEK 11.288288
SGD 1.456845
SHP 0.85947
SLE 28.060707
SLL 23871.008786
SOS 652.823503
SRD 43.055943
STD 23561.929364
STN 24.515796
SVC 9.995353
SYP 14801.067382
SZL 18.630168
THB 38.009826
TJS 10.572266
TMT 3.995673
TND 3.374259
TOP 2.740918
TRY 55.614418
TTD 7.764071
TWD 36.237665
TZS 3016.674244
UAH 51.273588
UGX 4443.98052
USD 1.138368
UYU 45.789705
UZS 13480.396382
VES 970.381102
VND 29584.489474
VUV 134.724064
WST 3.13339
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.017762
XAU 0.000266
XCD 3.076498
XCG 2.058835
XDR 0.804886
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 269.395117
ZAR 18.63125
ZMK 10246.679142
ZMW 22.247335
ZWL 366.554189
SSP 6503.033018
MXV 2.262092
  • BCC

    -1.2400

    77.76

    -1.59%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67

    0%

  • NGG

    -1.6100

    75.25

    -2.14%

  • RIO

    -2.2400

    95.25

    -2.35%

  • BCE

    -0.0900

    21.61

    -0.42%

  • CMSC

    -0.1020

    20.508

    -0.5%

  • RELX

    0.2400

    33.22

    +0.72%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2300

    19.67

    -1.17%

  • VOD

    -0.2700

    16.35

    -1.65%

  • CMSD

    -0.0800

    20.34

    -0.39%

  • JRI

    -0.2350

    11.25

    -2.09%

  • AZN

    -5.0400

    163.33

    -3.09%

  • GSK

    -1.0100

    49.71

    -2.03%

  • BP

    1.3900

    44.49

    +3.12%

  • BTI

    0.1000

    55.85

    +0.18%

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers
Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers / Photo: Purple ROMERO - AFP

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

A new online voting system aimed at boosting turnout among the Philippines' millions of overseas workers ahead of Monday's mid-term elections has been marked by confusion and fears of disenfranchisement.

Text size:

Thousands of overseas Filipino workers, or OFWs, have already cast their ballots in the race dominated by a bitter feud between President Ferdinand Marcos and his impeached vice president Sara Duterte.

While official turnout figures are not yet publicly available, data from the Commission on Elections (Comelec) show at least 134,000 of the 1.22 million registered overseas voters have signed up for the new online system, which opened April 13.

But Jun Burlasa III, a Filipino working in Singapore, says he will not vote again if he has to do it online.

"I'd rather do manual," the 50-year-old told AFP this week, describing the new system as "confusing and suspicious".

At issue is a digital QR code generated after voting that leads users to a page asking them to verify their ballot has been submitted correctly. Below that is a box containing a jumble of computer code and candidate names.

Burlasa said many of the names visible were candidates for whom he had not voted.

Similar stories about the anxiety-inducing webpage have proliferated across social media, including Facebook posts that have reached thousands.

Eman Villanueva, a Hong Kong-based activist with migrant rights group BAYAN, said he was unsure his vote had been properly counted.

"There is absolutely no way for the voters to know if the votes that went through really reflected our choices," he said.

In previous overseas elections, voters could review the names they selected after the fact, but Comelec told AFP the QR code was never supposed to serve that purpose.

The landing page was only intended to verify a ballot's receipt, the commission said, adding that the name of every candidate running in the election should appear.

"We are definitely considering the feedback and studying how to incorporate them in future elections," Ian Geonanga, Comelec's director of overseas voting, told AFP.

Election watchdogs, however, say the commission failed to properly explain the new system and warn of the confusion risks disenfranchising voters.

"It's a natural reaction of people that if you're not familiar with the system, then you won't trust it the first instance," said Ona Caritos, executive director of the nonprofit Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente).

- ChatGPT, disinfo and 2028 -

Since April 14, 1.5 million people have watched a video in which a Philippines-based engineer named Jaydee San Juan quizzes ChatGPT about the names visible on the ballot verification page.

"It's highly likely showing the candidates that were selected/voted for using that ballot ID," the AI chatbot replied.

Comelec, however, got the opposite answer when conducting the ChatGPT experiment itself, Geonanga told AFP.

The election commission's efforts to quell fears about the new system, meanwhile, have been misrepresented to sow more disinformation.

AFP fact-checkers recently debunked a video edited to make it appear Geonanga was saying online ballots were "designed" to rig the election's results.

The fiasco has also left election watchdogs and migrant groups sceptical that the switch to online voting will boost turnout as intended.

Danilo Arao, convenor of voting watchdog Kontra Daya, said even a small change to the ballot's design might have helped assuage fears he believes could lead to "widespread disenfranchisement".

Lente's Caritos said losing trust in the online voting system could impact OFWs' participation in the 2028 presidential election.

“We don't want that, because if election results are not trusted by our voters, then it would go into the legitimacy of the government," she said. "It's a domino effect."

C.Zeman--TPP