The Prague Post - Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

EUR -
AED 4.311132
AFN 81.889993
ALL 97.860241
AMD 450.034767
ANG 2.100522
AOA 1076.304459
ARS 1481.163161
AUD 1.794945
AWG 2.112702
AZN 1.996521
BAM 1.954615
BBD 2.366445
BDT 143.343077
BGN 1.954363
BHD 0.442386
BIF 3491.652912
BMD 1.173723
BND 1.499078
BOB 8.099158
BRL 6.443385
BSD 1.172079
BTN 100.618699
BWP 15.637451
BYN 3.835641
BYR 23004.975778
BZD 2.354252
CAD 1.60259
CDF 3386.191824
CHF 0.93554
CLF 0.028795
CLP 1104.989932
CNY 8.421348
CNH 8.419082
COP 4732.569532
CRC 591.938527
CUC 1.173723
CUP 31.103666
CVE 110.200052
CZK 24.645017
DJF 208.711659
DKK 7.46035
DOP 70.147164
DZD 152.144588
EGP 58.295432
ERN 17.605849
ETB 162.661969
FJD 2.634654
FKP 0.86074
GBP 0.86112
GEL 3.180759
GGP 0.86074
GHS 12.189712
GIP 0.86074
GMD 83.929948
GNF 10164.749491
GTQ 9.00969
GYD 245.213392
HKD 9.213669
HNL 30.621301
HRK 7.535063
HTG 153.325717
HUF 399.945615
IDR 19061.735134
ILS 3.932959
IMP 0.86074
INR 100.545418
IQD 1535.368952
IRR 49443.09205
ISK 142.61933
JEP 0.86074
JMD 187.065766
JOD 0.832199
JPY 171.456908
KES 151.703515
KGS 102.642003
KHR 4708.104892
KMF 493.57154
KPW 1056.348676
KRW 1604.667556
KWD 0.358397
KYD 0.976708
KZT 608.850793
LAK 25256.469289
LBP 105014.924211
LKR 352.633159
LRD 235.001499
LSL 20.810303
LTL 3.4657
LVL 0.709974
LYD 6.313118
MAD 10.549892
MDL 19.772841
MGA 5139.861291
MKD 61.546969
MMK 2463.896144
MNT 4212.272678
MOP 9.476953
MRU 46.472621
MUR 52.946411
MVR 18.074217
MWK 2031.959163
MXN 21.85752
MYR 4.974823
MZN 75.071604
NAD 20.810481
NGN 1794.024522
NIO 43.133476
NOK 11.847116
NPR 160.986692
NZD 1.95136
OMR 0.451288
PAB 1.171875
PEN 4.158978
PGK 4.913999
PHP 66.193885
PKR 333.007845
PLN 4.246373
PYG 9340.256488
QAR 4.284675
RON 5.063675
RSD 117.157494
RUB 92.368463
RWF 1692.466478
SAR 4.402068
SBD 9.785242
SCR 17.220349
SDG 704.822251
SEK 11.159473
SGD 1.499707
SHP 0.922362
SLE 26.392494
SLL 24612.394075
SOS 669.790985
SRD 43.724128
STD 24293.701619
SVC 10.255781
SYP 15260.594953
SZL 20.804296
THB 38.124288
TJS 11.281151
TMT 4.119769
TND 3.418385
TOP 2.748978
TRY 46.969429
TTD 7.944183
TWD 34.108486
TZS 3101.789097
UAH 49.036555
UGX 4204.48622
USD 1.173723
UYU 47.042275
UZS 14718.074956
VES 130.614564
VND 30661.759425
VUV 139.466502
WST 3.216575
XAF 655.556678
XAG 0.031926
XAU 0.000352
XCD 3.172046
XDR 0.815302
XOF 655.553887
XPF 119.331742
YER 284.217264
ZAR 20.895408
ZMK 10564.921183
ZMW 28.392541
ZWL 377.938409
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers
Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers / Photo: Purple ROMERO - AFP

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

A new online voting system aimed at boosting turnout among the Philippines' millions of overseas workers ahead of Monday's mid-term elections has been marked by confusion and fears of disenfranchisement.

Text size:

Thousands of overseas Filipino workers, or OFWs, have already cast their ballots in the race dominated by a bitter feud between President Ferdinand Marcos and his impeached vice president Sara Duterte.

While official turnout figures are not yet publicly available, data from the Commission on Elections (Comelec) show at least 134,000 of the 1.22 million registered overseas voters have signed up for the new online system, which opened April 13.

But Jun Burlasa III, a Filipino working in Singapore, says he will not vote again if he has to do it online.

"I'd rather do manual," the 50-year-old told AFP this week, describing the new system as "confusing and suspicious".

At issue is a digital QR code generated after voting that leads users to a page asking them to verify their ballot has been submitted correctly. Below that is a box containing a jumble of computer code and candidate names.

Burlasa said many of the names visible were candidates for whom he had not voted.

Similar stories about the anxiety-inducing webpage have proliferated across social media, including Facebook posts that have reached thousands.

Eman Villanueva, a Hong Kong-based activist with migrant rights group BAYAN, said he was unsure his vote had been properly counted.

"There is absolutely no way for the voters to know if the votes that went through really reflected our choices," he said.

In previous overseas elections, voters could review the names they selected after the fact, but Comelec told AFP the QR code was never supposed to serve that purpose.

The landing page was only intended to verify a ballot's receipt, the commission said, adding that the name of every candidate running in the election should appear.

"We are definitely considering the feedback and studying how to incorporate them in future elections," Ian Geonanga, Comelec's director of overseas voting, told AFP.

Election watchdogs, however, say the commission failed to properly explain the new system and warn of the confusion risks disenfranchising voters.

"It's a natural reaction of people that if you're not familiar with the system, then you won't trust it the first instance," said Ona Caritos, executive director of the nonprofit Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente).

- ChatGPT, disinfo and 2028 -

Since April 14, 1.5 million people have watched a video in which a Philippines-based engineer named Jaydee San Juan quizzes ChatGPT about the names visible on the ballot verification page.

"It's highly likely showing the candidates that were selected/voted for using that ballot ID," the AI chatbot replied.

Comelec, however, got the opposite answer when conducting the ChatGPT experiment itself, Geonanga told AFP.

The election commission's efforts to quell fears about the new system, meanwhile, have been misrepresented to sow more disinformation.

AFP fact-checkers recently debunked a video edited to make it appear Geonanga was saying online ballots were "designed" to rig the election's results.

The fiasco has also left election watchdogs and migrant groups sceptical that the switch to online voting will boost turnout as intended.

Danilo Arao, convenor of voting watchdog Kontra Daya, said even a small change to the ballot's design might have helped assuage fears he believes could lead to "widespread disenfranchisement".

Lente's Caritos said losing trust in the online voting system could impact OFWs' participation in the 2028 presidential election.

“We don't want that, because if election results are not trusted by our voters, then it would go into the legitimacy of the government," she said. "It's a domino effect."

C.Zeman--TPP