The Prague Post - US Supreme Court's right-wing skeptical of using race in college admissions

EUR -
AED 4.288018
AFN 79.960491
ALL 97.655834
AMD 447.991031
ANG 2.089265
AOA 1070.536389
ARS 1466.010684
AUD 1.774673
AWG 2.104298
AZN 1.989113
BAM 1.948021
BBD 2.358681
BDT 142.052765
BGN 1.954873
BHD 0.440054
BIF 3480.601501
BMD 1.167433
BND 1.493935
BOB 8.101649
BRL 6.45999
BSD 1.168135
BTN 100.037537
BWP 15.565844
BYN 3.822935
BYR 22881.692399
BZD 2.34653
CAD 1.599121
CDF 3369.212857
CHF 0.931081
CLF 0.028903
CLP 1109.131781
CNY 8.37668
CNH 8.370812
COP 4688.061845
CRC 589.147457
CUC 1.167433
CUP 30.936982
CVE 110.614641
CZK 24.642994
DJF 207.476327
DKK 7.461288
DOP 70.282823
DZD 151.516417
EGP 57.795885
ERN 17.511499
ETB 158.041295
FJD 2.61651
FKP 0.859421
GBP 0.862062
GEL 3.163585
GGP 0.859421
GHS 12.172506
GIP 0.859421
GMD 83.47586
GNF 10105.302712
GTQ 8.974165
GYD 244.404062
HKD 9.164217
HNL 30.762193
HRK 7.531349
HTG 153.267981
HUF 399.054413
IDR 18942.422263
ILS 3.870863
IMP 0.859421
INR 100.254385
IQD 1529.337604
IRR 49163.53233
ISK 142.812139
JEP 0.859421
JMD 186.684544
JOD 0.827685
JPY 171.492461
KES 151.182498
KGS 102.091773
KHR 4694.249027
KMF 492.073956
KPW 1050.678224
KRW 1606.855277
KWD 0.356897
KYD 0.973513
KZT 606.020082
LAK 25134.838563
LBP 104602.022084
LKR 350.918735
LRD 234.654211
LSL 20.698243
LTL 3.447127
LVL 0.706169
LYD 6.298301
MAD 10.509823
MDL 19.765075
MGA 5171.7296
MKD 61.513833
MMK 2451.086777
MNT 4187.3557
MOP 9.445583
MRU 46.346608
MUR 53.071115
MVR 17.981869
MWK 2027.250221
MXN 21.798238
MYR 4.971509
MZN 74.668855
NAD 20.698468
NGN 1786.896443
NIO 42.902987
NOK 11.790972
NPR 160.05986
NZD 1.941435
OMR 0.448883
PAB 1.168135
PEN 4.139675
PGK 4.81537
PHP 65.933107
PKR 332.133115
PLN 4.256895
PYG 9053.846801
QAR 4.250157
RON 5.078568
RSD 117.149625
RUB 90.598648
RWF 1674.099332
SAR 4.378468
SBD 9.720618
SCR 17.133342
SDG 701.04933
SEK 11.117426
SGD 1.496083
SHP 0.917419
SLE 26.273855
SLL 24480.496562
SOS 667.187612
SRD 43.624632
STD 24163.511975
SVC 10.221185
SYP 15178.886357
SZL 20.699111
THB 37.973688
TJS 11.302069
TMT 4.097691
TND 3.384065
TOP 2.734243
TRY 46.898725
TTD 7.932325
TWD 34.173688
TZS 3070.349466
UAH 48.892665
UGX 4186.28362
USD 1.167433
UYU 47.460484
UZS 14782.626389
VES 132.43128
VND 30481.683088
VUV 139.442741
WST 3.2116
XAF 653.348095
XAG 0.031207
XAU 0.00035
XCD 3.155047
XDR 0.811849
XOF 651.427065
XPF 119.331742
YER 282.343854
ZAR 20.755195
ZMK 10508.302466
ZMW 27.364729
ZWL 375.913042
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

US Supreme Court's right-wing skeptical of using race in college admissions
US Supreme Court's right-wing skeptical of using race in college admissions / Photo: CHIP SOMODEVILLA - GETTY IMAGES/AFP

US Supreme Court's right-wing skeptical of using race in college admissions

The conservative-majority US Supreme Court appeared poised on Monday to ban the use of race as a factor in deciding who gets into America's elite universities.

Text size:

The top US court heard nearly five hours of arguments on the use of race in admissions to Harvard and the University of North Carolina (UNC) -- respectively the oldest private and public institutions of higher education in the country.

Harvard and UNC, like a number of other top US schools, consider an applicant's race as a factor in trying to ensure a diverse student body and representation of minorities, a policy known as "affirmative action."

It emerged from the Civil Rights Movement in the late 1960s to help address the legacy of discrimination in higher education against African Americans.

The suits against Harvard and UNC were brought by a group known as Students for Fair Admissions, which claims that race-conscious admissions policies discriminate against equally qualified applicants of Asian American origin.

"The racial preference is operating to the disadvantage of Asian American applicants," Patrick Strawbridge, attorney for Students for Fair Admissions, told the court.

"When you use race, you're telling applicants that their race matters," Strawbridge said, calling it "inherently divisive."

"It gets us further away from a world where the government treats race as irrelevant," he said.

Strawbridge's arguments appeared to get a sympathetic hearing from the conservative justices on the court, setting the stage for another potential historic reversal like in June, when the high court overturned its landmark 1973 "Roe v. Wade" decision guaranteeing a woman's right to abortion.

Conservatives currently enjoy a solid 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court, including three justices nominated by former president Donald Trump, a Republican.

- 'Don't have a clue what it means' -

Justice Clarence Thomas, a longtime opponent of affirmative action, said he could not think of another case "where the court deferred to the alleged discriminator."

"I've heard the word diversity quite a few times and I don't have a clue what it means," he added. "It seems to mean everything for everyone."

Conservative justices John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett repeatedly pressed the attorneys for Harvard and UNC about when there would be an "end point" to affirmative action.

"Your position is that race matters because it's necessary for diversity," Roberts said. "It's not going to stop mattering at some particular point.

"You're always going to have to look at race because you say race matters to give us the necessary diversity."

Justice Elena Kagan and the other two liberal justices on the court pushed back against the arguments put forward by Students for Fair Admissions.

"For decades, this court has rightly recognized that student body diversity is a compelling interest that can justify limited consideration of race in university admissions," Kagan said.

"That holding recognizes a simple but profound truth -- when students of all races and backgrounds come to college and live together and learn together they become better colleagues, better citizens and better leaders," she said.

"In your view, it really wouldn't matter if there was a precipitous decline in minority admissions," Kagan said to Strawbridge. "Your brief says it just doesn't matter if our institutions look like America.

"Doesn't it?" she asked.

- 'Cause racial diversity to plummet' -

The administration of Democratic President Joe Biden and dozens of major American companies have weighed in on the side of the universities.

"A blanket ban on race-conscious admissions would cause racial diversity to plummet at many of our nation's leading educational institutions," US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar told the court.

Previous courts have upheld affirmative action -- in 2016 by a single vote -- but the policy has been controversial from the start, and a number of white students have mounted legal challenges over the years, claiming "reverse discrimination."

Nine states have banned affirmative action at public universities including California, where voters did so in a ballot proposition in 1996 and rebuffed an attempt to revive the policy in 2020.

In a 1978 decision -- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke -- the Supreme Court banned the use of quotas in university admissions as unconstitutional.

But the court said race or ethnic origin can be considered as one factor among others in admitting students to ensure a diverse student body and to combat previous discrimination that could have prevented marginalized students from being accepted to those schools.

Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman on the Supreme Court, sat out the Harvard case because she has served previously on the Board of Overseers at the school.

T.Kolar--TPP