The Prague Post - US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

EUR -
AED 4.176437
AFN 80.755833
ALL 98.648486
AMD 442.139184
ANG 2.049303
AOA 1041.541772
ARS 1324.68065
AUD 1.777787
AWG 2.049541
AZN 1.933025
BAM 1.953772
BBD 2.277336
BDT 138.106667
BGN 1.954281
BHD 0.428557
BIF 3380.591472
BMD 1.137055
BND 1.489454
BOB 7.853814
BRL 6.400827
BSD 1.13663
BTN 96.815095
BWP 15.518031
BYN 3.719739
BYR 22286.276316
BZD 2.28323
CAD 1.5734
CDF 3272.443989
CHF 0.93841
CLF 0.028021
CLP 1075.301608
CNY 8.26582
CNH 8.259794
COP 4772.219474
CRC 574.618796
CUC 1.137055
CUP 30.131955
CVE 110.150197
CZK 24.923104
DJF 202.40993
DKK 7.465445
DOP 66.98225
DZD 150.667745
EGP 57.808781
ERN 17.055824
ETB 152.14983
FJD 2.570256
FKP 0.848698
GBP 0.850756
GEL 3.121201
GGP 0.848698
GHS 16.254059
GIP 0.848698
GMD 81.292118
GNF 9844.696158
GTQ 8.753876
GYD 238.511413
HKD 8.819163
HNL 29.496646
HRK 7.534812
HTG 148.725646
HUF 404.548197
IDR 18880.228321
ILS 4.130978
IMP 0.848698
INR 96.330153
IQD 1489.054593
IRR 47870.012032
ISK 146.112985
JEP 0.848698
JMD 180.054715
JOD 0.806515
JPY 162.557884
KES 147.024932
KGS 99.435329
KHR 4550.237544
KMF 491.491876
KPW 1023.30654
KRW 1616.574042
KWD 0.348451
KYD 0.947217
KZT 581.42657
LAK 24585.484096
LBP 101843.402408
LKR 340.486628
LRD 227.333064
LSL 21.09141
LTL 3.357427
LVL 0.687793
LYD 6.218546
MAD 10.543611
MDL 19.561698
MGA 5129.721262
MKD 61.514437
MMK 2387.123721
MNT 4063.014709
MOP 9.082374
MRU 44.999693
MUR 51.349716
MVR 17.5123
MWK 1970.971772
MXN 22.221294
MYR 4.907553
MZN 72.782808
NAD 21.09141
NGN 1822.73333
NIO 41.826591
NOK 11.768064
NPR 154.909315
NZD 1.919124
OMR 0.437768
PAB 1.136615
PEN 4.167275
PGK 4.709092
PHP 63.461878
PKR 319.314909
PLN 4.277447
PYG 9102.552968
QAR 4.143681
RON 4.977689
RSD 117.078491
RUB 92.896576
RWF 1624.827971
SAR 4.265049
SBD 9.507254
SCR 16.188589
SDG 682.796347
SEK 10.968924
SGD 1.484846
SHP 0.893547
SLE 25.868169
SLL 23843.454557
SOS 649.631497
SRD 41.900187
STD 23534.741016
SVC 9.945678
SYP 14783.316789
SZL 21.084303
THB 37.969652
TJS 12.002679
TMT 3.991063
TND 3.400056
TOP 2.663094
TRY 43.77866
TTD 7.711996
TWD 36.357785
TZS 3064.36292
UAH 47.221906
UGX 4165.658378
USD 1.137055
UYU 47.859277
UZS 14717.725293
VES 98.409954
VND 29569.11304
VUV 136.91211
WST 3.147822
XAF 655.282682
XAG 0.035124
XAU 0.000346
XCD 3.072948
XDR 0.814961
XOF 655.276925
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.635358
ZAR 21.176909
ZMK 10234.862539
ZMW 31.797999
ZWL 366.131218
  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • BCC

    -0.8300

    94.5

    -0.88%

  • SCS

    0.1500

    10.01

    +1.5%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    22.24

    -0.36%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    22.35

    -0.58%

  • RELX

    0.4300

    53.79

    +0.8%

  • NGG

    0.1900

    73.04

    +0.26%

  • GSK

    0.9100

    38.97

    +2.34%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    60.88

    +0.02%

  • BTI

    0.4700

    42.86

    +1.1%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1300

    10.12

    -1.28%

  • BCE

    0.1100

    21.92

    +0.5%

  • AZN

    1.7800

    71.71

    +2.48%

  • BP

    -1.0600

    28.07

    -3.78%

  • JRI

    0.1300

    12.93

    +1.01%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.58

    +0.1%

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning
US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

US Supreme Court hears climate case as UN issues stark warning

A divided US Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday in an environmental regulation case with potentially far-reaching implications for the Biden administration's fight against climate change.

Text size:

The case concerns the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants, which produce nearly 20 percent of the electricity in the United States.

As the Supreme Court was hearing arguments, the United Nations issued a landmark report containing dire warnings over climate change.

While the three liberal justices on the nine-member Supreme Court appeared largely to support arguments that the EPA was operating within its brief, several of the conservative justices appeared skeptical.

"This agency is doing greenhouse gas regulation," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the liberal members of the court. "This is in, you know, exactly in its wheelhouse."

Jacob Roth, arguing for The North America Coal Corp., said the EPA is going beyond its remit.

"The agency is asking questions like: Should we phase out the coal industry? Should we build more solar farms in this country? Should we restrict how consumers use electricity in order to bring down emissions?

"Those are not the types of questions we expect the agency to be answering," Roth said.

In 2007, the Supreme Court, by a narrow majority, ruled that the EPA has the power to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act of 1970.

In 2015, Democratic president Barack Obama unveiled his Clean Power Plan, which was intended to combat global warming by reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal- and gas-burning plants and shifting energy production to clean sources such as solar and wind power.

The Clean Power Plan was blocked in the Supreme Court in 2016 and repealed by former Republican president Donald Trump, who replaced it with his own industry-friendly Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule.

Trump, a climate change skeptic hostile to government regulation of industry, also nominated three justices to the Supreme Court, giving conservatives a 6-3 majority.

- 'Constrain EPA authority' -

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out Trump's ACE rule on the last day of his presidency, setting the stage for the case currently before the Supreme Court: West Virginia vs EPA.

West Virginia and several other coal-producing states asked the Supreme Court to intervene and define the powers of the EPA. The case has also been embraced by opponents of strong government regulatory authority.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing before the court for the Biden administration, said the justices should just wait until the EPA publishes its new rules.

"The DC Circuit's judgment leaves no EPA rule in effect," Prelogar said. "No federal regulation will occur until EPA completes its upcoming rulemaking.

"Petitioners aren't harmed by the status quo," she said. "Instead, what they seek from this court is a decision to constrain EPA authority in the upcoming rulemaking."

In its brief to the court, West Virginia accused the EPA of acting like "the country's central energy planning authority."

Justice Samuel Alito, one of the more conservative members of the court, questioned how far the EPA could go in regulating emissions.

"Is there any reason EPA couldn't force the adoption of a system for single family homes that is similar to what it has done, what it is claiming it can do, with respect to existing power plants?" Alito asked.

Prelogar, the solicitor general, replied that the EPA "has never listed homes as a source category and couldn't do so because they are far too diverse and differentiated."

UN experts, in the report issued Monday on the global impacts of climate change, said humanity is perilously close to missing its chance to secure a "liveable" future.

"The cumulative scientific evidence is unequivocal: Climate change is a threat to human wellbeing and planetary health," the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said.

Any further delay in global action to cut carbon pollution and prepare for impacts already in the pipeline "will miss a brief and rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a liveable and sustainable future for all," the 195-nation IPCC warned.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision in West Virginia vs EPA before June.

A.Slezak--TPP