The Prague Post - British court spares Shell in climate case

EUR -
AED 4.309924
AFN 79.974243
ALL 96.943022
AMD 448.467719
ANG 2.101155
AOA 1076.160019
ARS 1701.464628
AUD 1.778669
AWG 2.112418
AZN 1.99972
BAM 1.955659
BBD 2.36313
BDT 142.789722
BGN 1.955659
BHD 0.441168
BIF 3501.547958
BMD 1.173566
BND 1.505192
BOB 8.107416
BRL 6.274356
BSD 1.173316
BTN 103.49655
BWP 15.629875
BYN 3.974114
BYR 23001.884322
BZD 2.35973
CAD 1.625799
CDF 3327.058693
CHF 0.935026
CLF 0.028454
CLP 1116.249652
CNY 8.361307
CNH 8.360974
COP 4566.871276
CRC 591.057456
CUC 1.173566
CUP 31.099486
CVE 110.257064
CZK 24.324263
DJF 208.934961
DKK 7.46464
DOP 74.384646
DZD 151.793074
EGP 56.346944
ERN 17.603483
ETB 168.466974
FJD 2.627266
FKP 0.866426
GBP 0.865685
GEL 3.15735
GGP 0.866426
GHS 14.31397
GIP 0.866426
GMD 83.914454
GNF 10176.267511
GTQ 8.995353
GYD 245.472331
HKD 9.128233
HNL 30.739787
HRK 7.534765
HTG 153.528949
HUF 390.89166
IDR 19255.745805
ILS 3.914974
IMP 0.866426
INR 103.599436
IQD 1537.08936
IRR 49377.769947
ISK 143.234125
JEP 0.866426
JMD 188.216452
JOD 0.832104
JPY 173.328633
KES 151.589089
KGS 102.628756
KHR 4702.661502
KMF 492.315191
KPW 1056.153297
KRW 1634.812435
KWD 0.358372
KYD 0.97783
KZT 634.444333
LAK 25441.168742
LBP 105070.437021
LKR 354.014518
LRD 208.265009
LSL 20.363334
LTL 3.465234
LVL 0.709879
LYD 6.335544
MAD 10.566139
MDL 19.488597
MGA 5199.62573
MKD 61.535571
MMK 2463.819115
MNT 4223.953258
MOP 9.405523
MRU 46.838629
MUR 53.374204
MVR 17.967732
MWK 2034.45356
MXN 21.64067
MYR 4.934889
MZN 75.003016
NAD 20.363334
NGN 1763.051862
NIO 43.176892
NOK 11.571478
NPR 165.594081
NZD 1.974536
OMR 0.449868
PAB 1.173316
PEN 4.089006
PGK 4.972642
PHP 67.093181
PKR 333.121922
PLN 4.257298
PYG 8384.39649
QAR 4.283192
RON 5.066327
RSD 117.131569
RUB 97.762963
RWF 1700.177621
SAR 4.402641
SBD 9.631311
SCR 16.690799
SDG 705.903978
SEK 10.93388
SGD 1.507332
SHP 0.922238
SLE 27.432139
SLL 24609.086612
SOS 670.551734
SRD 46.209187
STD 24290.436982
STN 24.498237
SVC 10.266261
SYP 15258.141087
SZL 20.343536
THB 37.214196
TJS 11.040905
TMT 4.119215
TND 3.415554
TOP 2.748612
TRY 48.49936
TTD 7.977426
TWD 35.558923
TZS 2886.392237
UAH 48.371218
UGX 4123.703175
USD 1.173566
UYU 46.996617
UZS 14604.948735
VES 186.280467
VND 30964.526421
VUV 139.400507
WST 3.142011
XAF 655.909788
XAG 0.027822
XAU 0.000322
XCD 3.17162
XCG 2.114648
XDR 0.815741
XOF 655.909788
XPF 119.331742
YER 281.128048
ZAR 20.406087
ZMK 10563.502225
ZMW 27.836996
ZWL 377.887621
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    77.27

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    24.4

    +0.04%

  • NGG

    0.5300

    71.6

    +0.74%

  • GSK

    -0.6500

    40.83

    -1.59%

  • AZN

    -1.5400

    79.56

    -1.94%

  • RIO

    -0.1000

    62.44

    -0.16%

  • RELX

    0.1700

    46.5

    +0.37%

  • RYCEF

    0.1800

    15.37

    +1.17%

  • CMSC

    -0.0200

    24.36

    -0.08%

  • SCS

    -0.1900

    16.81

    -1.13%

  • VOD

    -0.0100

    11.85

    -0.08%

  • BCC

    -3.3300

    85.68

    -3.89%

  • BCE

    -0.1400

    24.16

    -0.58%

  • JRI

    0.1100

    14.23

    +0.77%

  • BTI

    -0.7200

    56.59

    -1.27%

  • BP

    -0.5800

    33.89

    -1.71%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: BEN STANSALL - AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

C.Sramek--TPP