The Prague Post - British court spares Shell in climate case

EUR -
AED 4.300395
AFN 73.771059
ALL 95.492494
AMD 434.89817
ANG 2.095907
AOA 1074.953577
ARS 1644.938934
AUD 1.634616
AWG 2.109216
AZN 1.987981
BAM 1.958138
BBD 2.357996
BDT 143.970693
BGN 1.953303
BHD 0.441779
BIF 3483.645619
BMD 1.170973
BND 1.494872
BOB 8.089626
BRL 5.850417
BSD 1.170688
BTN 110.624157
BWP 15.833773
BYN 3.303116
BYR 22951.07702
BZD 2.354602
CAD 1.60219
CDF 2719.585571
CHF 0.923494
CLF 0.026528
CLP 1044.062825
CNY 8.006471
CNH 8.006964
COP 4232.635282
CRC 532.531374
CUC 1.170973
CUP 31.030793
CVE 110.541334
CZK 24.360698
DJF 208.105235
DKK 7.473618
DOP 69.380325
DZD 155.173427
EGP 61.862199
ERN 17.5646
ETB 184.281899
FJD 2.576488
FKP 0.864136
GBP 0.866514
GEL 3.155807
GGP 0.864136
GHS 13.044631
GIP 0.864136
GMD 86.133089
GNF 10278.215614
GTQ 8.944605
GYD 244.932486
HKD 9.177327
HNL 31.171228
HRK 7.533928
HTG 153.361827
HUF 363.996829
IDR 20276.573963
ILS 3.461361
IMP 0.864136
INR 110.910966
IQD 1533.975046
IRR 1541000.885095
ISK 143.198065
JEP 0.864136
JMD 184.460273
JOD 0.830222
JPY 186.903149
KES 151.176503
KGS 102.377731
KHR 4695.603381
KMF 492.97925
KPW 1053.871083
KRW 1728.280527
KWD 0.36018
KYD 0.975657
KZT 536.626229
LAK 25697.009943
LBP 104850.588697
LKR 373.172437
LRD 215.166524
LSL 19.362015
LTL 3.45758
LVL 0.70831
LYD 7.429809
MAD 10.838821
MDL 20.248006
MGA 4858.368407
MKD 61.641492
MMK 2459.090039
MNT 4211.235716
MOP 9.450044
MRU 46.838679
MUR 54.777669
MVR 18.091763
MWK 2038.664498
MXN 20.372418
MYR 4.626554
MZN 74.836877
NAD 19.379494
NGN 1610.04165
NIO 42.992293
NOK 10.920567
NPR 176.998852
NZD 1.998887
OMR 0.450237
PAB 1.170693
PEN 4.117123
PGK 5.087586
PHP 72.020714
PKR 326.379512
PLN 4.249872
PYG 7338.700835
QAR 4.266148
RON 5.09561
RSD 117.421743
RUB 88.20729
RWF 1710.20653
SAR 4.392081
SBD 9.398156
SCR 16.001437
SDG 703.173879
SEK 10.855111
SGD 1.495093
SHP 0.87425
SLE 28.835202
SLL 24554.720488
SOS 669.207686
SRD 43.870506
STD 24236.783483
STN 24.883183
SVC 10.244146
SYP 129.450246
SZL 19.37966
THB 38.18662
TJS 10.981514
TMT 4.104261
TND 3.376795
TOP 2.819423
TRY 52.775901
TTD 7.960438
TWD 36.947137
TZS 3053.456924
UAH 51.59397
UGX 4355.163524
USD 1.170973
UYU 46.204781
UZS 14133.64802
VES 567.475409
VND 30855.146912
VUV 138.439027
WST 3.194196
XAF 656.735632
XAG 0.015868
XAU 0.000255
XCD 3.164614
XCG 2.109902
XDR 0.817009
XOF 655.16
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.452944
ZAR 19.385053
ZMK 10540.165858
ZMW 22.21243
ZWL 377.05293
  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    23.2

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    0.2200

    87.45

    +0.25%

  • CMSC

    -0.0300

    22.83

    -0.13%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.81

    -0.16%

  • RIO

    -1.4600

    98.49

    -1.48%

  • BCC

    -1.2500

    82.61

    -1.51%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    23.5

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    0.2500

    54.47

    +0.46%

  • BTI

    1.1500

    58.47

    +1.97%

  • AZN

    -0.8300

    186.68

    -0.44%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    63.47

    -0.84%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1000

    15.3

    -0.65%

  • VOD

    -0.0200

    15.49

    -0.13%

  • RELX

    -0.3800

    36.01

    -1.06%

  • BP

    0.3800

    46.35

    +0.82%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: BEN STANSALL - AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

C.Sramek--TPP