The Prague Post - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

EUR -
AED 4.176437
AFN 80.755833
ALL 98.648486
AMD 442.139184
ANG 2.049303
AOA 1041.541772
ARS 1324.68065
AUD 1.777787
AWG 2.049541
AZN 1.933025
BAM 1.953772
BBD 2.277336
BDT 138.106667
BGN 1.954281
BHD 0.428557
BIF 3380.591472
BMD 1.137055
BND 1.489454
BOB 7.853814
BRL 6.400827
BSD 1.13663
BTN 96.815095
BWP 15.518031
BYN 3.719739
BYR 22286.276316
BZD 2.28323
CAD 1.5734
CDF 3272.443989
CHF 0.93841
CLF 0.028021
CLP 1075.301608
CNY 8.26582
CNH 8.259794
COP 4772.219474
CRC 574.618796
CUC 1.137055
CUP 30.131955
CVE 110.150197
CZK 24.923104
DJF 202.40993
DKK 7.465445
DOP 66.98225
DZD 150.667745
EGP 57.808781
ERN 17.055824
ETB 152.14983
FJD 2.570256
FKP 0.848698
GBP 0.850756
GEL 3.121201
GGP 0.848698
GHS 16.254059
GIP 0.848698
GMD 81.292118
GNF 9844.696158
GTQ 8.753876
GYD 238.511413
HKD 8.819163
HNL 29.496646
HRK 7.534812
HTG 148.725646
HUF 404.548197
IDR 18880.228321
ILS 4.130978
IMP 0.848698
INR 96.330153
IQD 1489.054593
IRR 47870.012032
ISK 146.112985
JEP 0.848698
JMD 180.054715
JOD 0.806515
JPY 162.557884
KES 147.024932
KGS 99.435329
KHR 4550.237544
KMF 491.491876
KPW 1023.30654
KRW 1616.574042
KWD 0.348451
KYD 0.947217
KZT 581.42657
LAK 24585.484096
LBP 101843.402408
LKR 340.486628
LRD 227.333064
LSL 21.09141
LTL 3.357427
LVL 0.687793
LYD 6.218546
MAD 10.543611
MDL 19.561698
MGA 5129.721262
MKD 61.514437
MMK 2387.123721
MNT 4063.014709
MOP 9.082374
MRU 44.999693
MUR 51.349716
MVR 17.5123
MWK 1970.971772
MXN 22.221294
MYR 4.907553
MZN 72.782808
NAD 21.09141
NGN 1822.73333
NIO 41.826591
NOK 11.768064
NPR 154.909315
NZD 1.919124
OMR 0.437768
PAB 1.136615
PEN 4.167275
PGK 4.709092
PHP 63.461878
PKR 319.314909
PLN 4.277447
PYG 9102.552968
QAR 4.143681
RON 4.977689
RSD 117.078491
RUB 92.896576
RWF 1624.827971
SAR 4.265049
SBD 9.507254
SCR 16.188589
SDG 682.796347
SEK 10.968924
SGD 1.484846
SHP 0.893547
SLE 25.868169
SLL 23843.454557
SOS 649.631497
SRD 41.900187
STD 23534.741016
SVC 9.945678
SYP 14783.316789
SZL 21.084303
THB 37.969652
TJS 12.002679
TMT 3.991063
TND 3.400056
TOP 2.663094
TRY 43.77866
TTD 7.711996
TWD 36.357785
TZS 3064.36292
UAH 47.221906
UGX 4165.658378
USD 1.137055
UYU 47.859277
UZS 14717.725293
VES 98.409954
VND 29569.11304
VUV 136.91211
WST 3.147822
XAF 655.282682
XAG 0.035124
XAU 0.000346
XCD 3.072948
XDR 0.814961
XOF 655.276925
XPF 119.331742
YER 278.635358
ZAR 21.176909
ZMK 10234.862539
ZMW 31.797999
ZWL 366.131218
  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    22.24

    -0.36%

  • RIO

    0.0100

    60.88

    +0.02%

  • GSK

    0.9100

    38.97

    +2.34%

  • NGG

    0.1900

    73.04

    +0.26%

  • BTI

    0.4700

    42.86

    +1.1%

  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1300

    10.12

    -1.28%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    22.35

    -0.58%

  • SCS

    0.1500

    10.01

    +1.5%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.58

    +0.1%

  • RELX

    0.4300

    53.79

    +0.8%

  • AZN

    1.7800

    71.71

    +2.48%

  • BP

    -1.0600

    28.07

    -3.78%

  • JRI

    0.1300

    12.93

    +1.01%

  • BCC

    -0.8300

    94.5

    -0.88%

  • BCE

    0.1100

    21.92

    +0.5%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

N.Kratochvil--TPP