The Prague Post - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

EUR -
AED 4.187514
AFN 75.816272
ALL 93.795134
AMD 415.989364
AOA 1045.595917
ARS 1706.355504
AUD 1.628071
AWG 2.052425
AZN 1.936044
BAM 1.95575
BBD 2.292611
BDT 140.40641
BHD 0.429278
BIF 3400.493769
BMD 1.140236
BND 1.469298
BOB 12.640677
BRL 5.797414
BSD 1.138241
BTN 109.859228
BWP 15.723184
BYN 3.264917
BYR 22348.622614
BZD 2.289311
CAD 1.607675
CDF 2576.933303
CHF 0.928949
CLF 0.027483
CLP 1081.650372
CNY 7.721793
CNH 7.715508
COP 3670.179744
CRC 517.973129
CUC 1.140236
CUP 30.21625
CVE 110.261214
CZK 24.151679
DJF 202.692151
DKK 7.475346
DOP 66.286561
DZD 151.985767
EGP 57.786931
ERN 17.103538
ETB 183.718069
FJD 2.53845
FKP 0.855861
GBP 0.854749
GEL 2.993142
GGP 0.855861
GHS 13.237545
GIP 0.855861
GMD 84.377557
GNF 9986.262988
GTQ 8.683778
GYD 238.141823
HKD 8.941735
HNL 30.487418
HRK 7.535592
HTG 148.819669
HUF 359.462201
IDR 20536.787852
ILS 3.452062
IMP 0.855861
INR 109.304206
IQD 1491.161876
IRR 1567824.290378
ISK 143.008771
JEP 0.855861
JMD 180.540634
JOD 0.808396
JPY 186.452502
KES 147.672114
KGS 99.713366
KHR 4602.680493
KMF 494.861875
KRW 1675.280062
KWD 0.353724
KYD 0.948576
KZT 541.216163
LAK 25774.341029
LBP 101932.193906
LKR 382.52022
LRD 206.022926
LSL 19.225808
LTL 3.36682
LVL 0.689717
LYD 7.283718
MAD 10.659634
MDL 20.118486
MGA 5043.738345
MKD 61.504009
MMK 2394.494449
MNT 4098.003519
MOP 9.194465
MRU 45.429643
MUR 53.979005
MVR 17.617246
MWK 1973.69761
MXN 19.875797
MYR 4.659687
MZN 72.864585
NAD 19.225808
NGN 1555.989179
NIO 41.886909
NOK 10.991828
NPR 175.771881
NZD 1.966183
OMR 0.438418
PAB 1.138271
PEN 3.873701
PGK 5.091624
PHP 70.369087
PKR 316.174898
PLN 4.314276
PYG 6881.733525
QAR 4.138094
RON 5.232564
RSD 117.422626
RUB 88.995376
RWF 1677.212991
SAR 4.273135
SBD 9.214366
SCR 15.352867
SDG 684.712465
SEK 11.0375
SGD 1.470779
SLE 27.622241
SOS 650.466256
SRD 43.092362
STD 23600.57992
STN 24.498192
SVC 9.959745
SZL 19.223003
THB 38.252063
TJS 10.500439
TMT 3.990825
TND 3.373914
TRY 53.986856
TTD 7.733802
TWD 36.853902
TZS 3010.220312
UAH 51.010754
UGX 4290.852665
USD 1.140236
UYU 45.708431
UZS 13775.647799
VES 845.258437
VND 30005.306331
VUV 135.315331
WST 3.142855
XAF 655.922972
XAG 0.019189
XAU 0.000278
XCD 3.081545
XCG 2.051448
XDR 0.815758
XOF 655.931601
XPF 119.331742
YER 272.003513
ZAR 19.045963
ZMK 10263.492626
ZMW 21.086183
ZWL 367.155478
  • CMSC

    -0.0650

    21.725

    -0.3%

  • RBGPF

    -0.7300

    66

    -1.11%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    18.17

    -1.05%

  • AZN

    0.9900

    169.26

    +0.58%

  • RIO

    -0.2900

    91.22

    -0.32%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    21.3

    +0.42%

  • BCC

    1.3800

    77.84

    +1.77%

  • GSK

    0.6100

    51.35

    +1.19%

  • NGG

    -0.0700

    82.3

    -0.09%

  • CMSD

    -0.0200

    21.98

    -0.09%

  • VOD

    -0.1000

    15.15

    -0.66%

  • RELX

    1.5500

    34.41

    +4.5%

  • BTI

    1.1200

    60.96

    +1.84%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    13.06

    +1.23%

  • BP

    -0.1100

    43.82

    -0.25%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

N.Kratochvil--TPP