The Prague Post - Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

EUR -
AED 4.314247
AFN 72.834015
ALL 95.548235
AMD 435.41981
ANG 2.102654
AOA 1078.414127
ARS 1642.91309
AUD 1.634016
AWG 2.114537
AZN 1.974411
BAM 1.956788
BBD 2.366995
BDT 144.582989
BGN 1.959591
BHD 0.443447
BIF 3492.76323
BMD 1.174743
BND 1.496255
BOB 8.1211
BRL 5.843987
BSD 1.175193
BTN 110.634851
BWP 15.822988
BYN 3.300466
BYR 23024.96355
BZD 2.365994
CAD 1.598373
CDF 2719.530063
CHF 0.921345
CLF 0.02668
CLP 1050.044176
CNY 8.030893
CNH 8.015113
COP 4175.635877
CRC 533.969561
CUC 1.174743
CUP 31.130691
CVE 110.320693
CZK 24.35828
DJF 209.275647
DKK 7.472764
DOP 69.86527
DZD 155.497455
EGP 61.753302
ERN 17.621146
ETB 183.500836
FJD 2.583027
FKP 0.870329
GBP 0.86585
GEL 3.148182
GGP 0.870329
GHS 13.038582
GIP 0.870329
GMD 86.334075
GNF 10314.206857
GTQ 8.984536
GYD 245.874123
HKD 9.207113
HNL 31.232767
HRK 7.537267
HTG 153.867676
HUF 363.652304
IDR 20212.981139
ILS 3.499265
IMP 0.870329
INR 110.588194
IQD 1539.577215
IRR 1547136.581076
ISK 143.811587
JEP 0.870329
JMD 185.523657
JOD 0.832925
JPY 187.031088
KES 151.895467
KGS 102.708602
KHR 4703.374375
KMF 493.391788
KPW 1057.268728
KRW 1727.835061
KWD 0.361539
KYD 0.979394
KZT 538.421808
LAK 25753.000728
LBP 105240.828077
LKR 374.018814
LRD 215.648865
LSL 19.367977
LTL 3.468711
LVL 0.71059
LYD 7.454763
MAD 10.859682
MDL 20.34327
MGA 4884.465795
MKD 61.665369
MMK 2466.869922
MNT 4201.457577
MOP 9.486889
MRU 46.92669
MUR 54.872583
MVR 18.149453
MWK 2037.828745
MXN 20.393065
MYR 4.643174
MZN 75.077649
NAD 19.367977
NGN 1596.125509
NIO 43.251835
NOK 10.887812
NPR 177.015362
NZD 1.985557
OMR 0.451695
PAB 1.175193
PEN 4.097969
PGK 5.103576
PHP 71.382677
PKR 327.562761
PLN 4.24437
PYG 7403.737583
QAR 4.295969
RON 5.095451
RSD 117.38388
RUB 87.989024
RWF 1722.269443
SAR 4.406255
SBD 9.451169
SCR 16.251034
SDG 705.436248
SEK 10.791483
SGD 1.495471
SHP 0.877064
SLE 28.928043
SLL 24633.769637
SOS 671.639059
SRD 44.009982
STD 24314.809095
STN 24.512374
SVC 10.283191
SYP 129.838452
SZL 19.351769
THB 37.943614
TJS 11.038272
TMT 4.117474
TND 3.419026
TOP 2.8285
TRY 52.890808
TTD 7.980029
TWD 36.918062
TZS 3057.270029
UAH 51.829644
UGX 4372.207194
USD 1.174743
UYU 46.743597
UZS 14189.163028
VES 567.594321
VND 30965.051746
VUV 138.842347
WST 3.205294
XAF 656.28831
XAG 0.015522
XAU 0.00025
XCD 3.174802
XCG 2.118069
XDR 0.817535
XOF 656.282721
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.35268
ZAR 19.363995
ZMK 10574.098394
ZMW 22.241228
ZWL 378.266779
  • RBGPF

    64.0000

    64

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1200

    15.3

    -0.78%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.95

    +0.17%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    36.53

    +1.09%

  • NGG

    0.4600

    87.42

    +0.53%

  • RIO

    0.7600

    99.61

    +0.76%

  • BTI

    0.8100

    58.09

    +1.39%

  • GSK

    -1.1900

    54.44

    -2.19%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    15.63

    +0.06%

  • AZN

    -2.5500

    189.75

    -1.34%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    23.32

    +0.39%

  • BCC

    0.3300

    84.15

    +0.39%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    23.88

    -0.92%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    12.89

    +0.08%

  • BP

    -0.1000

    46.25

    -0.22%

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?
Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

Will big biodiversity ambitions be enough to save nature?

After the world missed almost all of its targets to protect fast-dwindling nature for the last decade, observers following a new round of negotiations are focusing as much on how goals will be put in place as the headline targets.

Text size:

Nearly 200 nations are taking part in talks until Tuesday, aimed at fine-tuning a draft text to preserve biodiversity by 2050, with key milestones at 2030, which will be adopted at the United Nations COP15 conference later this year.

Countries are striving to increase their ambitions in the face of stark warnings that humanity is driving devastating declines in the biodiversity that supports all life on the planet.

But the world failed almost entirely to reach a similar set of 10-year objectives set a decade ago at UN talks in Aichi, Japan.

"The Aichi targets were largely missed because of lack of political will and parties not prioritising them enough," said AFP Anna Heslop, of the NGO ClientEarth, which is following the Geneva talks.

"There was just a lack of implementation. We can't afford to be in that position again in 10 years."

The text under negotiation includes a series of proposals to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

"What we need is a better system for encouraging parties to plan and report, and then the global community needs to do something. It is keeping these three elements is the challenge," said a delegate from a Global North country, who asked not to be named.

- Progress reports -

Member countries should develop stronger action plans to use natural resources sustainably, said the IDDRI think tank said to be more effective.

There should also be a more robust reporting system, with countries periodically measuring progress and passing on data that feeds into a global assessment, it added.

Currently, each country draws up its national biodiversity plan on a different basis, making comparisons difficult.

To address this, the delegations in Geneva are trying to develop common indicators to measure progress.

"Let's put in place mechanisms for collective and individual review, which will increase the pressure and this affects ambitions and implementation at the national level," said Juliette Landry, researcher at IDDRI.

Experts and conservation groups want national action plans to be updated regularly after COP15 with progress reports and a global stocktake before 2030.

That way, nations and the international community can see if they are going off track and increase their efforts.

But more reporting and administration requires more funding, and biodiversity-rich developing countries stress they will need both financial and technological support to meet these obligations.

"You cannot ask people to do spatial planning if they don't have the means," said a delegate from the Global South.

Another IDDRI proposal is the creation of a compliance mechanism, although Landry stressed that this would not be an exercise in finger-pointing.

Instead she said it would show the "gaps between what the countries had planned and what they implemented" and enable problems to be addressed and for countries to share their experiences, she said. So far, there has been little appetite for such a mechanism.

But without one "all of this process is meaningless" said Oscar Soria, of the advocacy group Avaaz.

"Because nobody will take responsibility and nobody will take the convention seriously from the outside," he said.

N.Kratochvil--TPP