The Prague Post - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.301343
AFN 77.611852
ALL 96.514738
AMD 446.868239
ANG 2.096972
AOA 1074.017289
ARS 1697.403887
AUD 1.766826
AWG 2.11114
AZN 1.995739
BAM 1.956099
BBD 2.35916
BDT 143.251875
BGN 1.956777
BHD 0.442668
BIF 3463.32887
BMD 1.171229
BND 1.514231
BOB 8.094236
BRL 6.490135
BSD 1.171279
BTN 104.951027
BWP 16.475516
BYN 3.442526
BYR 22956.085522
BZD 2.35576
CAD 1.615886
CDF 2996.593612
CHF 0.931783
CLF 0.027188
CLP 1066.568306
CNY 8.246564
CNH 8.23796
COP 4460.039473
CRC 584.989331
CUC 1.171229
CUP 31.037565
CVE 110.281841
CZK 24.338023
DJF 208.581852
DKK 7.472562
DOP 73.371204
DZD 152.341263
EGP 55.872532
ERN 17.568433
ETB 181.965387
FJD 2.67474
FKP 0.875628
GBP 0.875489
GEL 3.144796
GGP 0.875628
GHS 13.453054
GIP 0.875628
GMD 85.500123
GNF 10238.563486
GTQ 8.975371
GYD 245.057422
HKD 9.113976
HNL 30.857712
HRK 7.53616
HTG 153.573452
HUF 386.728509
IDR 19556.008162
ILS 3.75619
IMP 0.875628
INR 104.915577
IQD 1534.434317
IRR 49308.735131
ISK 147.141933
JEP 0.875628
JMD 187.41862
JOD 0.830448
JPY 184.770768
KES 150.983056
KGS 102.424413
KHR 4700.717826
KMF 491.916529
KPW 1054.119659
KRW 1728.453141
KWD 0.359837
KYD 0.976149
KZT 606.152563
LAK 25368.873969
LBP 104891.417505
LKR 362.65538
LRD 207.321659
LSL 19.649501
LTL 3.458335
LVL 0.708465
LYD 6.34897
MAD 10.73654
MDL 19.830028
MGA 5326.813434
MKD 61.5594
MMK 2459.639723
MNT 4161.636701
MOP 9.388034
MRU 46.876158
MUR 54.052655
MVR 18.095929
MWK 2031.110162
MXN 21.121594
MYR 4.775145
MZN 74.845892
NAD 19.649501
NGN 1710.181964
NIO 43.106583
NOK 11.874743
NPR 167.921643
NZD 2.034444
OMR 0.451419
PAB 1.171279
PEN 3.944502
PGK 4.982761
PHP 68.60009
PKR 328.173614
PLN 4.207347
PYG 7858.199991
QAR 4.264489
RON 5.07775
RSD 117.127615
RUB 94.513433
RWF 1705.460433
SAR 4.392871
SBD 9.541707
SCR 17.757712
SDG 704.49846
SEK 10.855305
SGD 1.514755
SHP 0.878725
SLE 28.168488
SLL 24560.087729
SOS 668.202038
SRD 45.023799
STD 24242.072559
STN 24.503742
SVC 10.248565
SYP 12952.131237
SZL 19.647
THB 36.805911
TJS 10.793648
TMT 4.099301
TND 3.428524
TOP 2.820038
TRY 50.065939
TTD 7.950214
TWD 36.91585
TZS 2922.446274
UAH 49.525863
UGX 4189.639781
USD 1.171229
UYU 45.987022
UZS 14081.15027
VES 330.473524
VND 30817.959199
VUV 141.64718
WST 3.265178
XAF 656.057184
XAG 0.017442
XAU 0.00027
XCD 3.165305
XCG 2.111022
XDR 0.815925
XOF 656.057184
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.225162
ZAR 19.652061
ZMK 10542.469351
ZMW 26.501047
ZWL 377.135213
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    80.22

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.1200

    23.17

    -0.52%

  • VOD

    0.0400

    12.84

    +0.31%

  • AZN

    0.7500

    91.36

    +0.82%

  • NGG

    -0.2800

    76.11

    -0.37%

  • GSK

    0.3200

    48.61

    +0.66%

  • RIO

    0.6900

    78.32

    +0.88%

  • RYCEF

    0.2800

    15.68

    +1.79%

  • RELX

    0.0800

    40.73

    +0.2%

  • BTI

    -0.5900

    56.45

    -1.05%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    23.25

    -0.13%

  • BCE

    -0.0100

    22.84

    -0.04%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    13.38

    -0.37%

  • BCC

    -2.9300

    74.77

    -3.92%

  • BP

    0.6300

    33.94

    +1.86%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

N.Kratochvil--TPP