The Prague Post - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

EUR -
AED 4.133496
AFN 79.901014
ALL 98.300698
AMD 437.813036
ANG 2.028226
AOA 1031.956036
ARS 1268.145798
AUD 1.754269
AWG 2.025649
AZN 1.917581
BAM 1.956366
BBD 2.271357
BDT 136.679539
BGN 1.955871
BHD 0.424209
BIF 3300.119807
BMD 1.125361
BND 1.460409
BOB 7.77318
BRL 6.356604
BSD 1.124925
BTN 96.00592
BWP 15.252938
BYN 3.681332
BYR 22057.066742
BZD 2.259634
CAD 1.569147
CDF 3232.035901
CHF 0.935968
CLF 0.02739
CLP 1051.087158
CNY 8.144577
CNH 8.147858
COP 4768.715323
CRC 570.960096
CUC 1.125361
CUP 29.822055
CVE 110.567117
CZK 24.960277
DJF 199.999519
DKK 7.463508
DOP 66.22791
DZD 149.7051
EGP 56.934474
ERN 16.880408
ETB 149.564776
FJD 2.553673
FKP 0.845242
GBP 0.845881
GEL 3.08916
GGP 0.845242
GHS 14.79893
GIP 0.845242
GMD 80.467613
GNF 9740.562555
GTQ 8.652503
GYD 236.030939
HKD 8.754011
HNL 29.079754
HRK 7.537782
HTG 146.911194
HUF 404.297467
IDR 18625.223483
ILS 3.986174
IMP 0.845242
INR 96.130943
IQD 1474.222318
IRR 47377.679471
ISK 146.983775
JEP 0.845242
JMD 178.811727
JOD 0.798223
JPY 163.66573
KES 145.738469
KGS 98.413212
KHR 4518.322995
KMF 491.224149
KPW 1012.802732
KRW 1571.172561
KWD 0.345153
KYD 0.937442
KZT 580.552785
LAK 24319.041837
LBP 100832.305501
LKR 336.104243
LRD 224.513674
LSL 20.538259
LTL 3.322898
LVL 0.68072
LYD 6.116379
MAD 10.412403
MDL 19.279978
MGA 5024.735237
MKD 61.530109
MMK 2362.563611
MNT 4024.463103
MOP 9.012527
MRU 44.508436
MUR 51.440657
MVR 17.33476
MWK 1954.75166
MXN 21.888432
MYR 4.835718
MZN 71.914736
NAD 20.538254
NGN 1808.578614
NIO 41.04757
NOK 11.670496
NPR 153.609072
NZD 1.904164
OMR 0.433006
PAB 1.124915
PEN 4.097481
PGK 4.572383
PHP 62.307881
PKR 316.455551
PLN 4.233663
PYG 8993.601699
QAR 4.097157
RON 5.12017
RSD 117.243917
RUB 92.791924
RWF 1602.51342
SAR 4.22104
SBD 9.389874
SCR 15.97473
SDG 675.783146
SEK 10.925567
SGD 1.460947
SHP 0.884357
SLE 25.60237
SLL 23598.229739
SOS 643.147674
SRD 41.30355
STD 23292.691251
SVC 9.842847
SYP 14631.484448
SZL 20.538246
THB 37.092299
TJS 11.642765
TMT 3.950016
TND 3.394369
TOP 2.635711
TRY 43.602999
TTD 7.642143
TWD 34.05499
TZS 3035.664164
UAH 46.730357
UGX 4117.191035
USD 1.125361
UYU 47.023603
UZS 14500.271038
VES 104.337792
VND 29235.178998
VUV 136.341926
WST 3.126761
XAF 656.14098
XAG 0.034382
XAU 0.000338
XCD 3.041344
XDR 0.80874
XOF 647.649041
XPF 119.331742
YER 275.094795
ZAR 20.47858
ZMK 10129.599402
ZMW 29.613303
ZWL 362.365637
  • RBGPF

    65.2700

    65.27

    +100%

  • RELX

    0.3486

    53.85

    +0.65%

  • GSK

    -0.2500

    36.62

    -0.68%

  • NGG

    0.5100

    70.69

    +0.72%

  • BP

    1.1800

    29.77

    +3.96%

  • AZN

    0.2700

    67.57

    +0.4%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    10.55

    +0.47%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    22.34

    +0.04%

  • BTI

    -1.6600

    41.64

    -3.99%

  • SCS

    -0.0200

    10.46

    -0.19%

  • RIO

    0.8000

    59.98

    +1.33%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.06

    -0.23%

  • BCC

    -0.9600

    88.62

    -1.08%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    12.98

    +0.23%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    9.3

    +0.54%

  • BCE

    0.4800

    22.71

    +2.11%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: Hugo SALAIS - METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

N.Kratochvil--TPP