The Prague Post - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.277263
AFN 80.942561
ALL 98.036348
AMD 445.196712
ANG 2.084513
AOA 1068.00532
ARS 1573.541484
AUD 1.788204
AWG 2.099324
AZN 1.97925
BAM 1.96646
BBD 2.345504
BDT 141.718224
BGN 1.956558
BHD 0.439158
BIF 3439.280671
BMD 1.164673
BND 1.501533
BOB 8.044643
BRL 6.309386
BSD 1.164206
BTN 102.233184
BWP 15.707213
BYN 3.956229
BYR 22827.599441
BZD 2.341503
CAD 1.605176
CDF 3342.612408
CHF 0.933666
CLF 0.028758
CLP 1128.183884
CNY 8.3321
CNH 8.327235
COP 4692.597407
CRC 586.17501
CUC 1.164673
CUP 30.863846
CVE 110.935032
CZK 24.530178
DJF 206.986056
DKK 7.464787
DOP 73.520001
DZD 151.329495
EGP 56.646922
ERN 17.470102
ETB 166.430828
FJD 2.633913
FKP 0.863878
GBP 0.862645
GEL 3.138832
GGP 0.863878
GHS 12.985948
GIP 0.863878
GMD 83.266566
GNF 10109.365557
GTQ 8.924377
GYD 243.477749
HKD 9.067035
HNL 30.758955
HRK 7.534508
HTG 152.386052
HUF 396.425756
IDR 19038.334401
ILS 3.87731
IMP 0.863878
INR 102.093585
IQD 1525.722208
IRR 48989.08025
ISK 142.998634
JEP 0.863878
JMD 186.058583
JOD 0.825703
JPY 171.701401
KES 150.822639
KGS 101.734445
KHR 4665.681609
KMF 493.242569
KPW 1048.224055
KRW 1621.434707
KWD 0.355866
KYD 0.970264
KZT 627.79313
LAK 25244.29717
LBP 104296.506359
LKR 351.89756
LRD 235.264245
LSL 20.603115
LTL 3.438978
LVL 0.704499
LYD 6.318346
MAD 10.567956
MDL 19.245408
MGA 5197.370596
MKD 61.583564
MMK 2444.713231
MNT 4189.533591
MOP 9.334219
MRU 46.529005
MUR 53.632764
MVR 17.936365
MWK 2023.03789
MXN 21.718667
MYR 4.917278
MZN 74.427711
NAD 20.60338
NGN 1789.835449
NIO 42.871237
NOK 11.735954
NPR 163.572692
NZD 1.986601
OMR 0.447816
PAB 1.164216
PEN 4.13634
PGK 4.828273
PHP 66.389859
PKR 328.263107
PLN 4.267456
PYG 8415.619237
QAR 4.240401
RON 5.066098
RSD 117.173162
RUB 93.577537
RWF 1682.953122
SAR 4.370114
SBD 9.56234
SCR 17.529363
SDG 699.38464
SEK 11.099949
SGD 1.496768
SHP 0.91525
SLE 27.125891
SLL 24422.617354
SOS 665.617526
SRD 44.843276
STD 24106.388759
STN 24.924012
SVC 10.187223
SYP 15143.355182
SZL 20.602896
THB 37.735498
TJS 11.089562
TMT 4.088004
TND 3.359501
TOP 2.727777
TRY 47.817765
TTD 7.915945
TWD 35.627034
TZS 2914.05026
UAH 48.095214
UGX 4148.488049
USD 1.164673
UYU 46.562405
UZS 14500.184553
VES 167.937472
VND 30724.08537
VUV 139.277101
WST 3.233485
XAF 659.535027
XAG 0.03014
XAU 0.000343
XCD 3.147588
XCG 2.098274
XDR 0.816496
XOF 656.291514
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.696559
ZAR 20.600709
ZMK 10483.383715
ZMW 27.214641
ZWL 375.024373
  • RBGPF

    1.4500

    77

    +1.88%

  • CMSC

    -0.0618

    23.8

    -0.26%

  • BCC

    -0.8000

    88.05

    -0.91%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    16.66

    +0.24%

  • BTI

    -0.5600

    56.77

    -0.99%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    24.98

    +0.32%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    79.93

    -0.15%

  • RIO

    0.1600

    62.11

    +0.26%

  • GSK

    0.0800

    39.91

    +0.2%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    23.91

    +0.17%

  • NGG

    0.6900

    71.73

    +0.96%

  • RELX

    0.0100

    47.87

    +0.02%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.38

    +0.15%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1000

    14.24

    -0.7%

  • BP

    0.2200

    34.89

    +0.63%

  • VOD

    0.2000

    12.06

    +1.66%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

D.Dvorak--TPP