The Prague Post - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

EUR -
AED 4.268018
AFN 77.161574
ALL 96.738871
AMD 444.721839
ANG 2.080238
AOA 1065.696187
ARS 1608.426875
AUD 1.783729
AWG 2.093333
AZN 1.978548
BAM 1.954573
BBD 2.339732
BDT 141.441233
BGN 1.956021
BHD 0.438174
BIF 3423.651344
BMD 1.162156
BND 1.505848
BOB 8.026962
BRL 6.324916
BSD 1.161671
BTN 102.496674
BWP 16.538549
BYN 3.9568
BYR 22778.25055
BZD 2.336434
CAD 1.631603
CDF 2725.255262
CHF 0.92868
CLF 0.028456
CLP 1116.343676
CNY 8.296626
CNH 8.287889
COP 4549.502307
CRC 585.132775
CUC 1.162156
CUP 30.797124
CVE 110.195368
CZK 24.284637
DJF 206.87017
DKK 7.468465
DOP 73.214051
DZD 151.560171
EGP 55.320985
ERN 17.432335
ETB 171.564727
FJD 2.641927
FKP 0.872641
GBP 0.86949
GEL 3.161243
GGP 0.872641
GHS 13.185725
GIP 0.872641
GMD 84.83767
GNF 10081.672822
GTQ 8.897416
GYD 243.00749
HKD 9.035182
HNL 30.510852
HRK 7.534838
HTG 152.004603
HUF 390.493014
IDR 19308.053808
ILS 3.819634
IMP 0.872641
INR 102.264758
IQD 1521.844902
IRR 48868.64531
ISK 141.620502
JEP 0.872641
JMD 186.113197
JOD 0.823979
JPY 175.976515
KES 150.092196
KGS 101.630859
KHR 4673.047128
KMF 493.916161
KPW 1045.982096
KRW 1654.680582
KWD 0.356248
KYD 0.968088
KZT 626.206997
LAK 25217.173901
LBP 104029.911651
LKR 351.94912
LRD 212.586582
LSL 20.112677
LTL 3.431544
LVL 0.702977
LYD 6.313038
MAD 10.665606
MDL 19.649584
MGA 5228.718498
MKD 61.621322
MMK 2440.08532
MNT 4179.109256
MOP 9.299823
MRU 46.47983
MUR 52.761342
MVR 17.784555
MWK 2014.036007
MXN 21.475404
MYR 4.918223
MZN 74.27387
NAD 20.112677
NGN 1698.501945
NIO 42.753168
NOK 11.739399
NPR 163.994373
NZD 2.031101
OMR 0.446853
PAB 1.161671
PEN 3.979303
PGK 4.881936
PHP 67.630474
PKR 328.864607
PLN 4.253269
PYG 8207.848819
QAR 4.236541
RON 5.089043
RSD 117.195209
RUB 91.171087
RWF 1686.234478
SAR 4.358512
SBD 9.57305
SCR 16.006494
SDG 699.036421
SEK 11.026648
SGD 1.507008
SHP 0.871918
SLE 27.020248
SLL 24369.822153
SOS 662.781192
SRD 45.550732
STD 24054.275372
STN 24.484634
SVC 10.164621
SYP 15110.473987
SZL 20.102384
THB 37.846782
TJS 10.722471
TMT 4.079166
TND 3.421353
TOP 2.721886
TRY 48.625626
TTD 7.883053
TWD 35.590206
TZS 2850.398187
UAH 48.51925
UGX 4010.483053
USD 1.162156
UYU 46.580766
UZS 14155.116361
VES 228.94315
VND 30611.179566
VUV 142.421929
WST 3.259066
XAF 655.542766
XAG 0.022024
XAU 0.000277
XCD 3.140784
XCG 2.093686
XDR 0.816549
XOF 655.545585
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.581114
ZAR 20.149838
ZMK 10460.79245
ZMW 26.225541
ZWL 374.213642
  • CMSD

    0.1040

    24.104

    +0.43%

  • BCE

    0.3450

    23.675

    +1.46%

  • CMSC

    0.0600

    23.78

    +0.25%

  • JRI

    0.0576

    13.9641

    +0.41%

  • BCC

    -0.6550

    73.465

    -0.89%

  • SCS

    0.1250

    16.705

    +0.75%

  • RIO

    0.9190

    69.139

    +1.33%

  • NGG

    0.6250

    74.875

    +0.83%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    75.55

    0%

  • GSK

    -0.4500

    43.7

    -1.03%

  • AZN

    -0.2660

    84.854

    -0.31%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    15

    +0.13%

  • BTI

    -0.2850

    50.815

    -0.56%

  • BP

    0.2550

    33.365

    +0.76%

  • RELX

    -0.3150

    45.115

    -0.7%

  • VOD

    0.0450

    11.395

    +0.39%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: MARTIN BERNETTI - AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

D.Dvorak--TPP