The Prague Post - Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

EUR -
AED 4.245913
AFN 76.887634
ALL 93.218842
AMD 422.094755
AOA 1060.176801
ARS 1724.882567
AUD 1.638747
AWG 2.082489
AZN 1.97002
BAM 1.955776
BBD 2.321671
BDT 142.688227
BHD 0.434695
BIF 3451.157116
BMD 1.156136
BND 1.477082
BOB 13.69983
BRL 5.876989
BSD 1.152686
BTN 109.688637
BWP 15.558807
BYN 3.432357
BYR 22660.258427
BZD 2.318271
CAD 1.612983
CDF 2615.761404
CHF 0.93588
CLF 0.026829
CLP 1055.916879
CNY 7.801146
CNH 7.796152
COP 3633.55485
CRC 523.993489
CUC 1.156136
CUP 30.637594
CVE 110.26363
CZK 24.258158
DJF 205.267449
DKK 7.477932
DOP 67.289164
DZD 152.967099
EGP 57.293288
ERN 17.342035
ETB 186.049588
FJD 2.553384
FKP 0.857252
GBP 0.858527
GEL 3.017966
GGP 0.857252
GHS 13.526832
GIP 0.857252
GMD 84.980421
GNF 10123.874202
GTQ 8.794891
GYD 241.157003
HKD 9.066767
HNL 30.895616
HRK 7.536622
HTG 150.718127
HUF 363.096405
IDR 20580.370421
ILS 3.468234
IMP 0.857252
INR 110.076256
IQD 1509.981237
IRR 1590322.371805
ISK 142.598215
JEP 0.857252
JMD 183.057725
JOD 0.819746
JPY 182.445186
KES 149.158147
KGS 101.104505
KHR 4681.941823
KMF 492.514185
KRW 1627.677557
KWD 0.356853
KYD 0.960588
KZT 540.233287
LAK 26025.676609
LBP 103223.017367
LKR 386.635196
LRD 208.057415
LSL 18.726567
LTL 3.413768
LVL 0.699335
LYD 7.331909
MAD 10.743067
MDL 20.044751
MGA 4918.938878
MKD 61.529235
MMK 2427.363841
MNT 4157.293457
MOP 9.314584
MRU 46.338424
MUR 54.419742
MVR 17.862733
MWK 1998.775164
MXN 20.094074
MYR 4.728715
MZN 73.882892
NAD 18.726567
NGN 1577.963717
NIO 42.419473
NOK 10.99759
NPR 175.501819
NZD 1.966719
OMR 0.442445
PAB 1.152686
PEN 3.903651
PGK 5.093937
PHP 70.183258
PKR 320.014324
PLN 4.299905
PYG 6853.914834
QAR 4.213648
RON 5.244583
RSD 117.338542
RUB 94.338828
RWF 1694.978938
SAR 4.329446
SBD 9.325039
SCR 16.705092
SDG 694.263698
SEK 10.961095
SGD 1.467719
SLE 28.445176
SOS 658.791814
SRD 43.778814
STD 23929.673396
STN 24.499696
SVC 10.085875
SZL 18.722767
THB 38.210709
TJS 10.633568
TMT 4.058036
TND 3.386358
TRY 55.144784
TTD 7.812903
TWD 37.286072
TZS 3051.762079
UAH 51.625959
UGX 4293.946644
USD 1.156136
UYU 46.399423
UZS 13785.828699
VES 873.763846
VND 30295.956222
VUV 137.068136
WST 3.160546
XAF 655.948849
XAG 0.018188
XAU 0.000266
XCD 3.124515
XCG 2.077474
XDR 0.81579
XOF 655.948849
XPF 119.331742
YER 275.626884
ZAR 18.667336
ZMK 10406.612213
ZMW 21.75673
ZWL 372.275202
  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    20.85

    +1.1%

  • RBGPF

    0.7600

    70.5

    +1.08%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?
Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO? / Photo: Jim WATSON - POOL/AFP/File

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

The White House has said President Donald Trump is discussing options including military action to take Greenland -- despite a warning from Denmark that an attack would spell the end of NATO.

Text size:

But how high really is the risk that Trump's desire for the territory might end up sinking an alliance that has underpinned Western security for over seven decades?

The answer depends on whether Trump is really planning to make a move and if the spectre of military force is just a bluff to exert pressure.

Here's how the situation could break down:

- US ups threats -

In the wake of his military intervention in Venezuela, Trump set off alarm bells in Europe by repeating his insistence that he wants to take control of Greenland.

The mineral-rich semi-autonomous territory -- part of Washington's long-standing NATO ally Denmark and home already to a US military base -- has been in Trump's sights since his first term in office.

But this time around his administration has ramped up its rhetoric by insisting that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority".

"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.

That came despite a warning from Danish premier Mette Frederiksen an attack on a NATO ally would end the alliance -- and a show of support for Copenhagen from key European leaders.

- Military route? -

While Trump was willing to deploy US military might against long-standing foe Venezuela, using force against a close ally like Denmark is a different ball game.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he couldn't "imagine a scenario" under which Washington would violate Danish sovereignty.

Any US military action against Greenland would effectively tear NATO apart.

Its Article Five pledge that members will defend each other if attacked is meant to deter threats from outside -- and the idea of its key power would turn on an ally was seen as inconceivable.

Under an existing agreement with Denmark, the United States could already station more troops Greenland if it wants.

Officials at NATO have repeatedly played down the prospect Trump could invade -- but admit that with the US leader they can never be sure.

"We don't believe he would -- there is no need -- the US can get any access they want from Denmark," a senior NATO diplomat told AFP, speaking as others on condition of anonymity.

"But given the persistent rhetoric, we can't be entirely sure."

So far there has been no sign of the sort of military buildup witnessed around Venezuela and some US officials have been pressing other options.

US media reported Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland rather than attack it -- and the hope from NATO is that diplomacy will win out.

"I hope the Danes, the Greenlanders and the Americans will sit around a fire somewhere and an outcome will be reached," a second NATO diplomat said.

- NATO steers clear -

So far NATO as an organisation has tried to stay out of the Greenland issue.

"I don't think this issue will ever be brought up in a NATO framework in order to avoid any divisions," a third NATO diplomat said.

With Russia's war raging in Ukraine, European members are desperate not to jeopardise US involvement in helping to shield them from Moscow.

Alliance chief Mark Rutte has tried to deflect US interest by emphasising joint efforts to bolster security in the Arctic against threats from Russia and China, a key justification by Trump for wanting Greenland.

"The Danes are totally fine if the US would have a bigger presence than they have now," Rutte told CNN. "We have to make sure that the Arctic stays safe."

While the alliance takes a backseat, some more bullish European members may try to be more assertive.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Paris was talking to Germany and Poland to come up with a plan for a possible response.

There are fears though that just by raising the prospect of attacking an ally -- or pressuring it to cede territory -- the United States may have already damaged NATO.

"No one has any interest in a quarrel within NATO, except our enemies," said Belgian defence minister Theo Francken.

"I'm convinced initiatives will be taken in the coming days, behind the scenes or in the open, to resolve this situation."

U.Pospisil--TPP