The Prague Post - Who rules the seas? Torpedoed Iran ship brings focus underwater

The sinking of IRIS Dena on Wednesday in international waters off the coast of Sri Lanka killed at least 86 crew members, in what Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi labelled an "atrocity".

It came after US-Israeli strikes on Iran on Saturday triggered war in the Middle East, with the Islamic republic launching retaliatory attacks across the region and beyond.

The US Navy had not torpedoed a ship since 1945.

Washington afterwards released what it said was periscope footage of the submarine firing on the ship, and an image of its hull almost vertical as it slipped below the surface.

The IRIS Dena "sank in less than 20 minutes", said Alessio Patalano, a professor at King's College London.

"It didn't stand a chance. The incident confirms the sophistication of the means of American undersea warfare."

Patalano said "submarine warfare has never gone away."

"It was just in the background because there hasn't been a confrontation between fleets since the 1980s," he added.

- 'Ultimate wartime weapon' -

The most recent confirmed wartime torpedo attack dates back to 1982, when the British submarine HMS Conqueror sank the Argentine cruiser Belgrano during the Falklands War.

In 2010, South Korea's Cheonan corvette was torpedoed -- an attack Seoul attributed to North Korea, but which Pyongyang denied.

A European military source specialising in submarines and speaking on condition of anonymity explained that a torpedo explodes underneath a ship rather than upon contact with it.

"It detonates a few metres below, creating a huge air bubble that lifts the vessel and breaks its main beam in two when it comes back down," the source said.

IRIS Dena's sonar range was probably too limited to have been able to detect the threat, they added.

The stealthy, invisible manoeuvres of a submarine, paired with its ability to fire torpedoes from dozens of kilometres away, make it "the ultimate wartime weapon", according to the source.

These capabilities can make a difference when surface combat between navies of similar standing is "symmetrical, with radars and missiles of roughly equivalent range".

Patalano said countries with a sophisticated underwater force enjoy an "objective advantage" in the event of a naval confrontation.

- 'We are everywhere' -

Another European military source, also speaking anonymously, said conducting the attack far from the conflict's epicentre was a "show of force aimed at major rivals" such as China and Russia.

"Attacking this ship in international waters... means: 'We, the Americans, dominate the air, the sea and the undersea. We are everywhere, able to find you and destroy you.'"

Experts suggest that while Russia has neglected the modernisation of its surface fleet -- signalled by its setbacks in the Black Sea throughout its war with Ukraine -- it has made a point of investing in its submarine fleet.

China has been developing its navy and submarines for years.

US submarine forces commander Vice Admiral Richard Seif told an American congressional committee this week that China's "formidable" next-generation submarines "challenge the US Navy's longstanding undersea dominance".

K.Dudek--TPP