The Prague Post - Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin

EUR -
AED 4.277114
AFN 76.27996
ALL 96.751784
AMD 447.525506
ANG 2.08467
AOA 1067.967686
ARS 1668.293194
AUD 1.77725
AWG 2.099249
AZN 2.00115
BAM 1.957224
BBD 2.347287
BDT 142.533671
BGN 1.956121
BHD 0.43905
BIF 3451.969513
BMD 1.164632
BND 1.510466
BOB 8.07087
BRL 6.258147
BSD 1.165413
BTN 102.770867
BWP 15.554046
BYN 3.971955
BYR 22826.788954
BZD 2.343985
CAD 1.629378
CDF 2597.129857
CHF 0.926873
CLF 0.027918
CLP 1095.177466
CNY 8.281059
CNH 8.277564
COP 4478.883858
CRC 584.114822
CUC 1.164632
CUP 30.86275
CVE 110.8713
CZK 24.326602
DJF 206.978545
DKK 7.469414
DOP 74.594323
DZD 151.411452
EGP 55.263538
ERN 17.469481
ETB 176.208441
FJD 2.639172
FKP 0.871871
GBP 0.873218
GEL 3.167379
GGP 0.871871
GHS 12.645197
GIP 0.871871
GMD 85.018438
GNF 10108.422645
GTQ 8.927493
GYD 243.827347
HKD 9.046804
HNL 30.711239
HRK 7.535404
HTG 152.637744
HUF 388.63715
IDR 19368.996281
ILS 3.79185
IMP 0.871871
INR 102.59011
IQD 1525.668037
IRR 48987.323081
ISK 143.013373
JEP 0.871871
JMD 186.772641
JOD 0.825691
JPY 178.033798
KES 150.575492
KGS 101.847253
KHR 4687.643873
KMF 492.639065
KPW 1048.169063
KRW 1664.789165
KWD 0.357079
KYD 0.971152
KZT 626.390642
LAK 25272.516301
LBP 104292.803611
LKR 354.36797
LRD 213.651844
LSL 20.078817
LTL 3.438856
LVL 0.704474
LYD 6.341462
MAD 10.744877
MDL 19.86434
MGA 5264.136764
MKD 61.637548
MMK 2445.198789
MNT 4183.030984
MOP 9.323461
MRU 46.660987
MUR 52.978822
MVR 17.830793
MWK 2022.363924
MXN 21.43453
MYR 4.901704
MZN 74.431412
NAD 20.078129
NGN 1698.464308
NIO 42.800672
NOK 11.625928
NPR 164.431775
NZD 2.018776
OMR 0.447801
PAB 1.165448
PEN 3.944641
PGK 4.884759
PHP 68.451311
PKR 327.2621
PLN 4.233613
PYG 8250.930428
QAR 4.240717
RON 5.084667
RSD 117.264471
RUB 92.294005
RWF 1688.71653
SAR 4.367433
SBD 9.585612
SCR 16.401339
SDG 700.523542
SEK 10.922706
SGD 1.510534
SHP 0.873776
SLE 27.025656
SLL 24421.752053
SOS 664.872174
SRD 46.465913
STD 24105.53287
STN 24.923127
SVC 10.196848
SYP 12877.018583
SZL 20.078523
THB 38.045043
TJS 10.779939
TMT 4.087859
TND 3.391394
TOP 2.727682
TRY 48.856817
TTD 7.910312
TWD 35.656728
TZS 2877.449501
UAH 49.060241
UGX 4051.947164
USD 1.164632
UYU 46.473802
UZS 14048.386005
VES 248.242465
VND 30635.647114
VUV 142.477809
WST 3.262263
XAF 656.423174
XAG 0.024828
XAU 0.000292
XCD 3.147477
XCG 2.10031
XDR 0.81638
XOF 655.687634
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.939685
ZAR 20.038951
ZMK 10483.088406
ZMW 25.610408
ZWL 375.011058
  • RBGPF

    -3.0900

    76

    -4.07%

  • NGG

    0.2200

    77.17

    +0.29%

  • CMSC

    0.0350

    24.315

    +0.14%

  • BTI

    0.0200

    52.09

    +0.04%

  • AZN

    0.7700

    84.06

    +0.92%

  • BP

    0.2300

    34.77

    +0.66%

  • RELX

    0.0700

    46.64

    +0.15%

  • SCS

    -0.1500

    16.63

    -0.9%

  • RIO

    0.3900

    70.93

    +0.55%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    43.8

    +1.28%

  • RYCEF

    0.1800

    14.95

    +1.2%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    24.65

    0%

  • BCC

    -0.0700

    73.02

    -0.1%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    14.08

    +0.07%

  • VOD

    0.1700

    11.9

    +1.43%

  • BCE

    -0.3300

    23.48

    -1.41%

Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin
Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin / Photo: Hector RETAMAL - AFP/File

Pair of new studies point to natural Covid origin

An animal market in China's Wuhan really was the epicenter of the Covid pandemic, according to a pair of new studies in the journal Science published Tuesday that claimed to have tipped the balance in the debate about the virus' origins.

Text size:

Answering the question of whether the disease spilled over naturally from animals to humans, or was the result of a lab accident, is viewed as vital to averting the next pandemic and saving millions of lives.

The first paper analyzed the geographic pattern of Covid cases in the outbreak's first month, December 2019, showing the first cases were tightly clustered around the Huanan Market.

The second examined genomic data from the earliest cases to study the virus' early evolution, concluding it was unlikely the coronavirus circulated widely in humans prior to November 2019.

Both were previously posted as "preprints" but have now been vetted by scientific peer review and appear in a prestigious journal.

Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona, who co-authored both papers, had previously called on the scientific community in a letter to be more open to the idea that the virus was the result of a lab leak.

But the findings moved him "to the point where now I also think it's just not plausible that this virus was introduced any other way than through the wildlife trade at the Wuhan market," he told reporters on a call about the findings.

Though previous investigation had centered on the live animal market, researchers wanted more evidence to determine it was really the progenitor of the outbreak, as opposed to an amplifier.

This required neighborhood-level study within Wuhan to be more certain the virus was "zoonotic" -- that it jumped from animals to people.

The first study's team used mapping tools to determine the location of the first 174 cases identified by the World Health Organization, finding 155 of them were in Wuhan.

Further, these cases clustered tightly around the market -- and some early patients with no recent history of visiting the market lived very close to it.

Mammals now known to be infectable with the virus -- including red foxes, hog badgers and raccoon dogs, were all sold live in the market, the team showed.

- Two introductions to humans -

They also tied positive samples from patients in early 2020 to the western portion of the market, which sold live or freshly butchered animals in late 2019.

The tightly confined early cases contrasted with how it radiated throughout the rest of the city by January and February, which the researchers confirmed by drilling into social media check-in data from the Weibo app.

"This tells us the virus was not circulating cryptically," Worobey said in a statement. "It really originated at that market and spread out from there."

The second study focused on resolving an apparent discrepancy in the virus' early evolution.

Two lineages, A and B, marked the early pandemic.

But while A was closer to the virus found in bats, suggesting the coronavirus in humans came from this source and that A gave rise to B, it was B that was found to be far more present around the market.

The researchers used a technique called "molecular clock analysis," which relies on the rate at which genetic mutations occur over time to reconstruct a timeline of evolution -- and found it unlikely that A gave rise to B.

"Otherwise, lineage A would have had to have been evolving in slow motion compared to the lineage B virus, which just doesn't make biological sense," said Worobey.

Instead, the probable scenario was both jumped from animals at the market to humans on separate occasions, in November and December 2019. The researchers concluded it was unlikely that there was human circulation prior to November 2019.

Under this scenario, there were probably other animal-to-human transmissions at the market that failed to manifest as Covid cases.

"Have we disproven the lab leak theory? No, we have not. Will we ever be able to know? No," said co-author Kristian Anderson of The Scripps Research Institute.

"But I think what's really important here is that there are possible scenarios and they're plausible scenarios and it's really important to understand that possible does not mean equally likely."

X.Kadlec--TPP