The Prague Post - Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

EUR -
AED 4.260899
AFN 80.158362
ALL 97.735274
AMD 445.179278
ANG 2.076169
AOA 1063.779861
ARS 1463.486047
AUD 1.792452
AWG 2.088118
AZN 1.974728
BAM 1.95178
BBD 2.340889
BDT 140.63036
BGN 1.95826
BHD 0.437391
BIF 3454.928951
BMD 1.160066
BND 1.489252
BOB 8.0115
BRL 6.460393
BSD 1.159302
BTN 99.605994
BWP 15.658749
BYN 3.794102
BYR 22737.288604
BZD 2.328814
CAD 1.594679
CDF 3347.9497
CHF 0.932003
CLF 0.029263
CLP 1122.94367
CNY 8.328167
CNH 8.33219
COP 4656.503901
CRC 585.005217
CUC 1.160066
CUP 30.741742
CVE 110.036947
CZK 24.640086
DJF 206.453013
DKK 7.463164
DOP 69.917205
DZD 151.014813
EGP 57.341587
ERN 17.400986
ETB 160.401527
FJD 2.623488
FKP 0.864042
GBP 0.865328
GEL 3.143771
GGP 0.864042
GHS 12.086108
GIP 0.864042
GMD 82.940384
GNF 10061.710714
GTQ 8.895602
GYD 242.550447
HKD 9.104376
HNL 30.329234
HRK 7.534857
HTG 152.227786
HUF 399.448339
IDR 18956.518334
ILS 3.889979
IMP 0.864042
INR 99.741413
IQD 1518.758894
IRR 48867.769059
ISK 142.212385
JEP 0.864042
JMD 185.389772
JOD 0.822444
JPY 172.386353
KES 149.89266
KGS 101.447527
KHR 4647.468203
KMF 490.998058
KPW 1044.023294
KRW 1612.653915
KWD 0.354597
KYD 0.966102
KZT 611.425446
LAK 24996.302498
LBP 103894.475134
LKR 349.611452
LRD 232.449247
LSL 20.810859
LTL 3.425372
LVL 0.701712
LYD 6.297974
MAD 10.489396
MDL 19.685287
MGA 5109.476595
MKD 61.433208
MMK 2434.949069
MNT 4160.305368
MOP 9.374112
MRU 46.177008
MUR 53.013435
MVR 17.862069
MWK 2010.359492
MXN 21.80703
MYR 4.929151
MZN 74.197206
NAD 20.811127
NGN 1772.375916
NIO 42.664336
NOK 11.957657
NPR 159.373504
NZD 1.958297
OMR 0.446035
PAB 1.159312
PEN 4.128397
PGK 4.783241
PHP 66.330271
PKR 330.618959
PLN 4.257488
PYG 8977.43282
QAR 4.215681
RON 5.071925
RSD 117.141075
RUB 90.923269
RWF 1675.264091
SAR 4.351203
SBD 9.635204
SCR 17.033332
SDG 696.613537
SEK 11.308327
SGD 1.491752
SHP 0.91163
SLE 26.275321
SLL 24326.00322
SOS 662.541151
SRD 43.065701
STD 24011.01876
SVC 10.14402
SYP 15082.997499
SZL 20.772039
THB 37.668435
TJS 11.100642
TMT 4.071831
TND 3.367089
TOP 2.716992
TRY 46.732796
TTD 7.866831
TWD 34.148279
TZS 3027.771466
UAH 48.548111
UGX 4154.443567
USD 1.160066
UYU 46.893016
UZS 14819.839482
VES 135.687081
VND 30338.619398
VUV 138.785447
WST 3.201936
XAF 654.614408
XAG 0.030698
XAU 0.000348
XCD 3.135135
XDR 0.814123
XOF 654.603146
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.981816
ZAR 20.735926
ZMK 10441.981556
ZMW 26.433672
ZWL 373.540697
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules
Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules / Photo: Giuseppe CACACE - AFP/File

Controversial carbon credits flood COP28, yet still no rules

The COP28 climate talks have been flooded with announcements hyping controversial carbon credits before rules for them have been hammered out, with environmental groups fearing "greenwashing" on a massive scale.

Text size:

The concept behind the credits has taken a major hit recently as scientific research has repeatedly shown claims of reduced emissions under the schemes are often hugely overestimated -- or simply non-existent.

Carbon credits allow corporations -- or countries under certain conditions -- to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

One credit equals the reduction or removal of one tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, often in developing countries by projects focusing on things like fighting deforestation.

Scientists stress that any offsetting should not be used as a passport to continue polluting, with emissions needing to fall by almost half this decade to meet global warming goals.

US climate envoy John Kerry declared on Sunday that his country's Energy Transition Accelerator for developing nations -- one of a number being touted -- as a "bold new idea" .

However environmental groups quickly expressed scepticism, pointing to the past failures of similar schemes.

The initiative -- a partnership between the US government, the Rockefeller Foundation and billionaire Jeff Bezos's Earth Fund -- aims to shift developing countries from dirty to clean fuel.

Under the scheme, companies -- and potentially countries -- will be able to buy credits for carbon emissions from projects that do things like boost renewable energy, build electrical transmission lines or "retire" coal plants.

- 'Smoke and mirrors' -

Amazon, Bank of America, Mastercard, McDonald's, Morgan Stanley, PepsiCo and Walmart are some of the US corporate giants lining up to pilot projects in Chile, the Dominican Republic and Nigeria.

Kerry said the initiative could generate tens of billions of dollars, insisting the credits will be "high integrity" and "not the kind of carbon crediting that you read about in some headlines."

He was referring to a series of investigations in recent months that have raised doubts about the effectiveness and integrity of the vast majority of carbon credits already in circulation.

Erika Lennon, a lawyer for the Center for International Environmental Law, said the announcement was "merely smoke and mirrors distracting from the US's paltry contribution to climate finance".

Washington said it was working with the World Bank to ensure the quality of the credits.

Separately on Friday, the World Bank said it had plans to help 15 developing countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and Latin America to earn money from carbon credits by 2028 for forest protection.

Such projects have previously been shown to be the least reliable for reducing emissions, but the World Bank insisted its scheme would be of "high integrity".

AFP has also identified hundreds of events dedicated to carbon credits at COP28, many led by companies seeking a way to compensate -- at least on paper -- for their carbon footprint.

- Vagueness -

Many different players have rushed to set up their own carbon credit rules, slowing down negotiations for a common regulatory framework, according to environmental groups.

This absence of common rules has given companies free rein to engage in widely-criticised offsetting as part of a voluntary carbon credit market.

At COP28, negotiators have been tasked with looking into applying Article Six of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

It allows countries to cooperate on hitting their emissions-reduction targets -- including by swapping carbon credits.

It also envisages a reform of the global carbon credit market that has been dragging on for years.

The Climate Action Network, which brings together hundreds of environmental groups, was scathing about the lack of ambition.

"Just like last year, we feel the draft (agreement) is more likely to remove ambition from climate action than carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," it added.

The network also criticised the vagueness of planned rules for a future UN supervisory body overseeing a global carbon market, which it said could leave the "door too wide open for risky practices" and to protect the rights of the communities involved.

These contentious rules could still be pushed through by countries impatient to start offsetting their emissions, led by wealthy and oil-producing nations -- and possibly developing countries keen to reap vast sums from the market.

On Friday, around 10 countries including the United States, France and the UAE -- as well as Colombia, Kenya and Senegal -- called for carbon markets to be "complementary" to efforts to reduce emissions.

They said that there must be "transparency" and "high-integrity standards" for these markets to reach their potential.

V.Nemec--TPP