The Prague Post - Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report

EUR -
AED 4.269858
AFN 80.389695
ALL 97.575354
AMD 446.887125
ANG 2.080805
AOA 1066.155881
ARS 1482.270607
AUD 1.77749
AWG 2.092781
AZN 1.969043
BAM 1.955306
BBD 2.349607
BDT 141.274317
BGN 1.956796
BHD 0.438489
BIF 3468.124018
BMD 1.162656
BND 1.493723
BOB 8.040969
BRL 6.488201
BSD 1.163706
BTN 100.181696
BWP 15.624054
BYN 3.808338
BYR 22788.064166
BZD 2.33751
CAD 1.596618
CDF 3355.426107
CHF 0.933298
CLF 0.029204
CLP 1120.676938
CNY 8.345489
CNH 8.349
COP 4675.918951
CRC 587.251671
CUC 1.162656
CUP 30.810393
CVE 110.237156
CZK 24.642464
DJF 207.017711
DKK 7.466231
DOP 70.282248
DZD 151.565717
EGP 57.459487
ERN 17.439845
ETB 161.69096
FJD 2.621676
FKP 0.86674
GBP 0.866975
GEL 3.1512
GGP 0.86674
GHS 12.131936
GIP 0.86674
GMD 83.128394
GNF 10097.449575
GTQ 8.934743
GYD 243.468504
HKD 9.124585
HNL 30.456307
HRK 7.535223
HTG 152.791408
HUF 399.058136
IDR 18984.143302
ILS 3.909926
IMP 0.86674
INR 100.161449
IQD 1524.414962
IRR 48962.365958
ISK 142.401981
JEP 0.86674
JMD 186.092996
JOD 0.824263
JPY 172.991051
KES 150.352024
KGS 101.6742
KHR 4663.822007
KMF 492.151837
KPW 1046.390713
KRW 1617.481043
KWD 0.355354
KYD 0.969755
KZT 620.363308
LAK 25095.661311
LBP 104268.063861
LKR 351.091321
LRD 233.321068
LSL 20.603896
LTL 3.433022
LVL 0.70328
LYD 6.329401
MAD 10.522742
MDL 19.795
MGA 5178.69196
MKD 61.544455
MMK 2441.242098
MNT 4169.117911
MOP 9.408024
MRU 46.291308
MUR 53.134905
MVR 17.974919
MWK 2017.890319
MXN 21.784576
MYR 4.936639
MZN 74.363938
NAD 20.603896
NGN 1779.991316
NIO 42.829182
NOK 11.842178
NPR 160.290514
NZD 1.950422
OMR 0.447147
PAB 1.163706
PEN 4.142254
PGK 4.818783
PHP 66.399534
PKR 331.423489
PLN 4.246227
PYG 9006.725072
QAR 4.231131
RON 5.074418
RSD 117.120418
RUB 91.406912
RWF 1681.575266
SAR 4.363132
SBD 9.648707
SCR 17.088084
SDG 698.172988
SEK 11.248915
SGD 1.493318
SHP 0.913665
SLE 26.627124
SLL 24380.326606
SOS 665.032026
SRD 43.260159
STD 24064.638741
STN 24.493813
SVC 10.182428
SYP 15116.689274
SZL 20.599797
THB 37.641015
TJS 11.200671
TMT 4.080924
TND 3.421036
TOP 2.723057
TRY 46.963445
TTD 7.900005
TWD 34.19337
TZS 3031.434317
UAH 48.599025
UGX 4169.94675
USD 1.162656
UYU 46.898154
UZS 14730.27941
VES 135.990147
VND 30415.089724
VUV 139.27412
WST 3.077437
XAF 655.79136
XAG 0.030458
XAU 0.000347
XCD 3.142137
XCG 2.09727
XDR 0.815594
XOF 655.79136
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.258475
ZAR 20.593492
ZMK 10465.304445
ZMW 26.794232
ZWL 374.374866
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report
Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report / Photo: Ludovic MARIN - AFP

Market-based schemes not reducing deforestation, poverty: report

Market-based approaches to forest conservation like carbon offsets and deforestation-free certification schemes have largely failed to protect trees or alleviate poverty, according to a major scientific review published on Monday.

Text size:

The global study -- the most comprehensive of its kind to date -- found that trade and finance-driven initiatives had made "limited" progress halting deforestation and in some cases worsened economic inequality.

Drawn from years of academic and field work, the report compiled by the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), a group of 15,000 scientists in 120 countries, will be presented at a high-level UN forum starting Monday.

Its authors urged a "radical rethink" of increasingly popular market-based approaches often promoted as effective at saving forests, curbing global warming and raising living standards in developing nations.

"The evidence does not support the claim of win-wins or triple wins for environment, economy and people often made for market mechanisms as a policy response to environmental problems," said contributing author Maria Brockhaus from the University of Helsinki.

"Rather our cases show that poverty and forest loss both are persistent across different regions of the world... where market mechanisms have been the main policy option for decades," she told AFP by email.

- No accountability -

Since the last IUFRO assessment in 2010, the report noted a rise in complex and overlapping market-based schemes "with financial actors and shareholders more often interested in short-term profits than long-term just and sustainable forest governance".

Its lead author, Constance McDermott from the University of Oxford, said this may not be true of all individual projects "but overall... it's hard to say they've been a rousing success".

The report said a $120 million project in the Democratic Republic of Congo had "reinforced entrenched interests" by restricting local people from forests without addressing logging by powerful extractive businesses.

In Malaysia, indigenous groups promised better livelihoods from a foreign-backed plantation venture on their customary land received no benefit, the report said.

"As both cases show, 'wins' are often gained elsewhere, while the burdens of forest loss, enclosures and forestland conversion are carried locally," said Brockhaus.

In Ghana, deforestation rates had risen despite a slew of sustainable cocoa standards, corporate pledges, and carbon offset projects, while farmers were earning less today than decades ago, said McDermott.

Meanwhile green trade policies imposed by wealthy countries -- like the EU's ban on imports linked to deforestation -- might look good from Brussels but did not consider the knock-on effects, she added.

"There's no accountability. If this doesn't work -- or farmers are pushed off their farm as a result -- it's not going to hurt the person eating chocolate in the UK or Germany," she said.

- 'Radical rethink' -

Despite recent turmoil, carbon markets are projected to grow into a multi-billion-dollar industry as corporations increasingly turn to credits to meet their net-zero climate targets.

Credits are purchased from projects, often in developing nations, that reduce or avoid the release of planet-heating emissions, such as protecting CO2-absorbing rainforests or peat swamps.

Kenya's President William Ruto has called Africa's carbon sinks an "unparalleled economic goldmine" that could generate billions of dollars every year.

But there are growing concerns about how much of that revenue poor communities might expect to see, with unscrupulous actors accused of exploitation.

Brockhaus said market-based approaches may be appealing to policymakers but would not be a solution without also addressing the broader economic and governance challenges around forest management.

"We advocate for a radical rethink," she said.

X.Kadlec--TPP