The Prague Post - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.184217
AFN 71.778596
ALL 94.26058
AMD 418.558169
ANG 2.039871
AOA 1044.771654
ARS 1684.037898
AUD 1.652409
AWG 2.052229
AZN 1.941395
BAM 1.955605
BBD 2.29677
BDT 140.265982
BGN 1.926481
BHD 0.429957
BIF 3386.861518
BMD 1.139336
BND 1.475553
BOB 7.880212
BRL 5.89839
BSD 1.140386
BTN 107.036303
BWP 15.497451
BYN 3.307369
BYR 22330.988246
BZD 2.293471
CAD 1.616661
CDF 2583.449152
CHF 0.922361
CLF 0.026741
CLP 1051.03496
CNY 7.745378
CNH 7.752824
COP 3917.408495
CRC 517.748256
CUC 1.139336
CUP 30.192408
CVE 110.253981
CZK 24.27816
DJF 203.069705
DKK 7.480658
DOP 67.003304
DZD 152.015808
EGP 56.43136
ERN 17.090042
ETB 183.850126
FJD 2.581854
FKP 0.861788
GBP 0.863068
GEL 3.01359
GGP 0.861788
GHS 12.857715
GIP 0.861788
GMD 83.171943
GNF 9992.001402
GTQ 8.700131
GYD 238.656149
HKD 8.935301
HNL 30.511951
HRK 7.539903
HTG 149.045104
HUF 354.163079
IDR 20349.226973
ILS 3.420345
IMP 0.861788
INR 107.508332
IQD 1493.850705
IRR 1566872.020062
ISK 144.115067
JEP 0.861788
JMD 179.602051
JOD 0.807834
JPY 184.293362
KES 147.565252
KGS 99.635383
KHR 4577.542521
KMF 494.472282
KPW 1025.40292
KRW 1749.211811
KWD 0.35275
KYD 0.950305
KZT 553.304703
LAK 25030.498458
LBP 102119.294221
LKR 383.321691
LRD 207.719241
LSL 18.745127
LTL 3.364164
LVL 0.689173
LYD 7.320268
MAD 10.693231
MDL 20.218979
MGA 4823.517939
MKD 61.628841
MMK 2391.906346
MNT 4077.580531
MOP 9.211779
MRU 45.511452
MUR 53.834064
MVR 17.603174
MWK 1977.402379
MXN 19.943172
MYR 4.65765
MZN 72.807828
NAD 18.745127
NGN 1567.875065
NIO 41.965806
NOK 11.31707
NPR 171.257885
NZD 2.017953
OMR 0.438079
PAB 1.140386
PEN 3.888611
PGK 5.0045
PHP 69.855021
PKR 317.362483
PLN 4.291823
PYG 6960.304389
QAR 4.156785
RON 5.244483
RSD 117.36827
RUB 89.906115
RWF 1670.033097
SAR 4.282472
SBD 9.173881
SCR 16.016599
SDG 683.602068
SEK 11.094411
SGD 1.474533
SHP 0.850629
SLE 28.259714
SLL 23891.313258
SOS 651.734866
SRD 42.70578
STD 23581.957684
STN 24.497552
SVC 9.978003
SYP 125.933213
SZL 18.734128
THB 38.028805
TJS 10.554045
TMT 3.987676
TND 3.379962
TOP 2.743248
TRY 53.039861
TTD 7.750225
TWD 36.299026
TZS 2999.100271
UAH 51.186584
UGX 4185.581694
USD 1.139336
UYU 45.775425
UZS 13697.631062
VES 707.246307
VND 29964.540351
VUV 136.297015
WST 3.167398
XAF 655.89145
XAG 0.019435
XAU 0.00028
XCD 3.079113
XCG 2.055195
XDR 0.815718
XOF 655.89145
XPF 119.331742
YER 271.874128
ZAR 19.354809
ZMK 10255.396502
ZMW 20.541947
ZWL 366.865771
  • CMSC

    -0.1160

    21.93

    -0.53%

  • BCE

    -0.2800

    22.92

    -1.22%

  • BCC

    1.2600

    81.02

    +1.56%

  • RBGPF

    3.7000

    65

    +5.69%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.77

    -0.73%

  • GSK

    0.6100

    52.5

    +1.16%

  • RELX

    0.4200

    31.34

    +1.34%

  • NGG

    -0.4100

    83.01

    -0.49%

  • RIO

    -1.3700

    93.74

    -1.46%

  • AZN

    2.7300

    188.41

    +1.45%

  • JRI

    0.2100

    12.79

    +1.64%

  • BTI

    0.2800

    62.76

    +0.45%

  • RYCEF

    0.3900

    18.39

    +2.12%

  • VOD

    0.0300

    13.89

    +0.22%

  • BP

    -0.5900

    37.13

    -1.59%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

W.Urban--TPP