The Prague Post - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

EUR -
AED 4.267024
AFN 77.670638
ALL 96.465871
AMD 445.058449
ANG 2.080243
AOA 1065.448908
ARS 1661.270266
AUD 1.769697
AWG 2.091394
AZN 1.973052
BAM 1.949049
BBD 2.343184
BDT 141.639403
BGN 1.955567
BHD 0.437957
BIF 3427.62771
BMD 1.161886
BND 1.503991
BOB 8.056096
BRL 6.222359
BSD 1.16337
BTN 103.203533
BWP 15.476394
BYN 3.955599
BYR 22772.957205
BZD 2.339796
CAD 1.622794
CDF 2881.475894
CHF 0.930467
CLF 0.028421
CLP 1114.957092
CNY 8.272103
CNH 8.303973
COP 4504.049419
CRC 585.369932
CUC 1.161886
CUP 30.789968
CVE 109.884393
CZK 24.381586
DJF 207.172416
DKK 7.465579
DOP 72.837399
DZD 150.900556
EGP 55.2477
ERN 17.428284
ETB 169.130753
FJD 2.634169
FKP 0.862276
GBP 0.867568
GEL 3.154546
GGP 0.862276
GHS 14.542629
GIP 0.862276
GMD 83.655791
GNF 10090.051045
GTQ 8.914124
GYD 243.357083
HKD 9.043194
HNL 30.545069
HRK 7.535759
HTG 152.232711
HUF 393.415608
IDR 19303.566888
ILS 3.820857
IMP 0.862276
INR 103.155458
IQD 1522.070099
IRR 48868.907312
ISK 141.610452
JEP 0.862276
JMD 186.214208
JOD 0.823734
JPY 176.998208
KES 150.111685
KGS 101.606918
KHR 4670.821654
KMF 491.477768
KPW 1045.692998
KRW 1650.644826
KWD 0.356237
KYD 0.969542
KZT 628.861809
LAK 25229.612079
LBP 104523.528002
LKR 351.891153
LRD 212.314605
LSL 20.031134
LTL 3.430746
LVL 0.702813
LYD 6.307154
MAD 10.612242
MDL 19.404788
MGA 5182.050907
MKD 61.622986
MMK 2439.423078
MNT 4179.169043
MOP 9.326296
MRU 46.40706
MUR 53.179655
MVR 17.770888
MWK 2016.914006
MXN 21.391481
MYR 4.90282
MZN 74.248288
NAD 20.031339
NGN 1705.113305
NIO 42.811713
NOK 11.614095
NPR 165.125344
NZD 2.022605
OMR 0.446748
PAB 1.16337
PEN 4.026852
PGK 4.882069
PHP 67.45915
PKR 329.545651
PLN 4.254085
PYG 8136.816472
QAR 4.252271
RON 5.099048
RSD 117.158714
RUB 95.358902
RWF 1682.410308
SAR 4.358284
SBD 9.562948
SCR 17.251236
SDG 698.873457
SEK 10.968374
SGD 1.505136
SHP 0.91306
SLE 27.095613
SLL 24364.163753
SOS 664.027936
SRD 44.224876
STD 24048.685496
STN 24.899208
SVC 10.17974
SYP 15106.679163
SZL 20.031108
THB 37.766513
TJS 10.790425
TMT 4.0666
TND 3.393291
TOP 2.721247
TRY 48.463223
TTD 7.901631
TWD 35.515587
TZS 2854.262554
UAH 48.078371
UGX 4001.141229
USD 1.161886
UYU 46.439149
UZS 13988.547804
VES 219.611274
VND 30627.30367
VUV 140.508882
WST 3.228337
XAF 653.689998
XAG 0.023863
XAU 0.000288
XCD 3.140054
XCG 2.096738
XDR 0.812984
XOF 653.692801
XPF 119.331742
YER 277.737453
ZAR 20.035009
ZMK 10458.360477
ZMW 27.601397
ZWL 374.12668
  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    23.74

    -0.25%

  • SCS

    -0.1200

    16.86

    -0.71%

  • NGG

    -0.0200

    73.88

    -0.03%

  • RIO

    -0.7300

    66.25

    -1.1%

  • BCC

    -0.6600

    74.52

    -0.89%

  • RBGPF

    -1.0800

    77.14

    -1.4%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    15.39

    -1.23%

  • BCE

    0.1000

    23.29

    +0.43%

  • JRI

    -0.1100

    14.07

    -0.78%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.4

    -0.16%

  • GSK

    0.0500

    43.5

    +0.11%

  • RELX

    -0.9700

    45.44

    -2.13%

  • AZN

    0.3800

    85.87

    +0.44%

  • VOD

    -0.0200

    11.27

    -0.18%

  • BTI

    0.8000

    51.98

    +1.54%

  • BP

    0.1400

    34.97

    +0.4%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: Damien MEYER - AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

W.Urban--TPP