The Prague Post - 'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

EUR -
AED 4.114065
AFN 72.259582
ALL 90.86402
AMD 404.561858
ANG 2.004979
AOA 1027.255243
ARS 1706.277137
AUD 1.593279
AWG 2.019222
AZN 1.908846
BAM 1.957179
BBD 2.25649
BDT 138.557623
BGN 1.95798
BHD 0.422796
BIF 3358.251113
BMD 1.120234
BND 1.432009
BOB 13.192354
BRL 5.581572
BSD 1.120389
BTN 106.305373
BWP 15.433943
BYN 3.289618
BYR 21956.591821
BZD 2.253188
CAD 1.568496
CDF 2594.46299
CHF 0.924177
CLF 0.028335
CLP 1115.204868
CNY 7.480981
CNH 7.47082
COP 3529.197267
CRC 511.260215
CUC 1.120234
CUP 26.887944
CVE 110.342744
CZK 24.330933
DJF 199.088476
DKK 7.473811
DOP 68.718417
DZD 151.086727
EGP 61.701626
ERN 16.803514
ETB 182.228905
FJD 2.506193
FKP 0.837207
GBP 0.83759
GEL 2.901844
GGP 0.837207
GHS 12.99021
GIP 0.837207
GMD 82.897735
GNF 9914.985741
GTQ 8.564034
GYD 234.646371
HKD 8.78527
HNL 30.078192
HRK 7.537165
HTG 146.833454
HUF 366.731529
IDR 20269.350965
ILS 3.478944
IMP 0.837207
INR 106.341992
IQD 1698.396629
IRR 2052689.282929
ISK 136.422562
JEP 0.837207
JMD 177.802893
JOD 0.79429
JPY 175.72038
KES 145.440447
KGS 97.962924
KHR 4577.245391
KMF 492.347215
KPW 1008.210806
KRW 1482.876946
KWD 0.348068
KYD 0.933662
KZT 508.676124
LAK 25210.875196
LBP 100326.834455
LKR 372.007122
LRD 191.015435
LSL 18.561678
LTL 3.307761
LVL 0.677619
LYD 7.175087
MAD 11.004406
MDL 20.222338
MGA 5066.592352
MKD 61.656697
MMK 2352.882903
MNT 4032.906877
MOP 9.051218
MRU 44.774547
MUR 52.830672
MVR 17.319246
MWK 1942.677411
MXN 20.912986
MYR 4.576498
MZN 71.587148
NAD 18.561678
NGN 1492.219693
NIO 41.229048
NOK 10.482469
NPR 170.087838
NZD 1.965324
OMR 0.429083
PAB 1.120294
PEN 3.847611
PGK 5.017468
PHP 71.267107
PKR 310.021779
PLN 4.40251
PYG 6479.565267
QAR 4.083877
RON 5.3545
RSD 117.984237
RUB 89.990404
RWF 1655.273634
SAR 4.205649
SBD 9.045421
SCR 15.665829
SDG 673.825035
SEK 11.125947
SGD 1.430319
SHP 0.837151
SLE 25.709792
SLL 23490.757589
SOS 640.248238
SRD 42.176265
STD 23186.587781
STN 24.517274
SVC 9.802907
SYP 14565.285711
SZL 18.560995
THB 37.797118
TJS 10.32402
TMT 3.932022
TND 3.345457
TOP 2.697255
TRY 55.671503
TTD 7.612363
TWD 36.503734
TZS 2963.020037
UAH 50.720362
UGX 4935.477359
USD 1.120234
UYU 44.931055
UZS 13407.446402
VES 985.569686
VND 28949.654292
VUV 133.227286
WST 3.09712
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.020782
XAU 0.000280356799
XCD 3.02749
XCG 2.019114
XDR 0.792064
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 264.491333
ZAR 18.568612
ZMK 10083.456786
ZMW 22.524971
ZWL 360.71498
SSP 6436.661213
MXV 2.360302
  • RBGPF

    -0.7200

    70.53

    -1.02%

  • BCC

    -0.5500

    77.74

    -0.71%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    19.6

    0%

  • RELX

    -0.0800

    40.54

    -0.2%

  • NGG

    -0.7800

    81.86

    -0.95%

  • JRI

    0.0700

    10.75

    +0.65%

  • RIO

    -0.7200

    83.42

    -0.86%

  • BCE

    -0.4100

    20.4

    -2.01%

  • GSK

    -0.4600

    50.75

    -0.91%

  • AZN

    -1.0800

    171.49

    -0.63%

  • BTI

    -0.9900

    59.48

    -1.66%

  • RYCEF

    -1.5000

    15.5

    -9.68%

  • CMSD

    0.1800

    19.78

    +0.91%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    15.74

    -2.41%

  • BP

    1.2700

    51.32

    +2.47%

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals
'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals / Photo: Alex Ogle - AFP/File

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

The black-and-white image appears to show the unlikeliest of interactions: an orangutan cradling endangered leopard cubs deep in the jungles of Malaysia's Sabah state.

Text size:

But the viral image is not just unlikely, it is fake, part of a trend of wildlife images generated by artificial intelligence that experts warn endanger animals and people.

AFP fact-checkers have debunked scores of similar synthetic visuals, from an elephant climbing a tree to escape flooding in Myanmar to a pink dolphin leaping out of water in the Philippines.

The images are often accompanied by heartwarming anecdotes and have circulated widely in multiple languages on platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and X.

They may seem more like feel-good fiction than dangerous misinformation, but experts warn hyper-realistic visuals of wild animals behaving like pets, or even like humans, can distort public perceptions of wildlife and harm conservation efforts.

"This misunderstanding can lead people to approach animals too closely or interact with them in unsafe ways," Jose Guerrero-Casado, a zoology professor at Spain's University of Cordoba, told AFP.

He cited a widely reported incident in China's northwest Xinjiang region in January, where a woman was attacked by a rare snow leopard after trying to get closer for a photo.

China's forestry department said it stepped up patrols after the incident and warned the public to maintain a safe distance when encountering wild animals.

- Sowing doubt -

Conservationists say AI visuals portraying wild animals as cute or cuddly make it harder for social media users to discern what is real and can fuel exploitation.

They increase demand for certain species "to be used in the tourism industry as photo props, exploited to make social media content or to be kept as pets", said Chris Lewis, a researcher at the international wildlife charity Born Free.

And while the visuals could encourage some people to support animal protection, "the negative impacts outweigh that completely," said Jenny Roberts of conservation group WWF.

"People could get hurt," she told AFP.

WWF uses real images for its fundraising efforts, but fake content online "desensitises" people to even the most incredible original visuals, she said.

"When you do have something remarkable, people question it," Roberts said, recounting an incident where a camera trap set up by her charity captured a tiger with five cubs in China.

Such footage had never been filmed before in the East Asian country, she said.

"But when we put the content out there, we were questioned on social media: 'Is this AI-generated?'"

- 'Major threat' -

A September study in the journal Conservation Biology, co-authored by Guerrero-Casado, concluded that the rapid spread of AI misinformation and its potential to harm environmental efforts is a "major threat" to society.

The researchers highlighted another challenge for those working in conservation: AI images "could affect the ability of people to identify species" and cause misunderstandings about the abundance and distribution of wildlife.

Scientists often mine data from citizen science platforms that accept photos and recordings of wildlife submitted by users.

But AI generation and manipulation could lead to flawed research, several experts warned in a recent commentary in the journal Nature.

They called for more robust authentication of submissions, and education of users about the risks of manipulating images and recordings.

Meta, Facebook's parent company, and TikTok require users to label realistic visuals that have been generated or significantly altered using AI. They also say their platforms have tools that automatically label content as AI-generated.

However, AFP fact-checkers spotted multiple wildlife posts without clear labels -- even when users had already said in their captions that they were fake.

Meta and TikTok pay AFP to fact-check posts with potentially false information.

"Conservation depends on a well-informed society that understands the ecological and conservation needs of wild species," Guerrero-Casado said.

"AI-generated fake content does not contribute to this goal."

Q.Fiala--TPP