The Prague Post - FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

EUR -
AED 4.100836
AFN 72.581059
ALL 90.772202
AMD 403.672763
ANG 1.998533
AOA 1025.069254
ARS 1720.459037
AUD 1.590034
AWG 2.009939
AZN 1.896945
BAM 1.955184
BBD 2.25391
BDT 138.656917
BGN 1.951686
BHD 0.422267
BIF 3348.564611
BMD 1.116633
BND 1.432771
BOB 13.266818
BRL 5.999112
BSD 1.119057
BTN 106.460444
BWP 15.437272
BYN 3.291792
BYR 21886.007578
BZD 2.250711
CAD 1.565866
CDF 2585.005478
CHF 0.924606
CLF 0.027996
CLP 1105.433602
CNY 7.446099
CNH 7.444425
COP 3519.046692
CRC 509.439426
CUC 1.116633
CUP 26.857895
CVE 110.230256
CZK 24.351088
DJF 199.278972
DKK 7.474685
DOP 68.488413
DZD 150.94665
EGP 62.815189
ERN 16.749496
ETB 183.294764
FJD 2.515555
FKP 0.836607
GBP 0.837754
GEL 2.895463
GGP 0.836607
GHS 13.009307
GIP 0.836607
GMD 82.631193
GNF 9903.789654
GTQ 8.554304
GYD 234.503435
HKD 8.759762
HNL 30.044127
HRK 7.534255
HTG 146.568552
HUF 367.281265
IDR 20259.073239
ILS 3.432475
IMP 0.836607
INR 106.248188
IQD 1695.358035
IRR 2028930.607136
ISK 136.374529
JEP 0.836607
JMD 177.661615
JOD 0.791685
JPY 176.142721
KES 144.905666
KGS 97.649292
KHR 4562.398508
KMF 492.435757
KPW 1004.969692
KRW 1478.226732
KWD 0.346983
KYD 0.932602
KZT 504.638679
LAK 25185.948668
LBP 100212.710627
LKR 371.837793
LRD 190.240037
LSL 18.610551
LTL 3.297127
LVL 0.67544
LYD 7.175802
MAD 10.991935
MDL 20.109571
MGA 5082.443541
MKD 61.555598
MMK 2344.674489
MNT 4019.217093
MOP 9.043109
MRU 44.999413
MUR 52.838902
MVR 17.252251
MWK 1940.505735
MXN 20.726082
MYR 4.563461
MZN 71.364249
NAD 18.610551
NGN 1496.210438
NIO 41.177021
NOK 10.406356
NPR 170.33631
NZD 1.961433
OMR 0.429349
PAB 1.119047
PEN 3.857901
PGK 5.09035
PHP 71.488522
PKR 309.674565
PLN 4.404425
PYG 6451.024423
QAR 4.090711
RON 5.345651
RSD 117.499895
RUB 90.224382
RWF 1654.556261
SAR 4.181959
SBD 9.005252
SCR 15.531903
SDG 671.655189
SEK 11.11673
SGD 1.430513
SHP 0.836743
SLE 25.62717
SLL 23415.241437
SOS 639.489844
SRD 42.08815
STD 23112.049449
STN 24.492061
SVC 9.79187
SYP 14518.46243
SZL 18.604303
THB 37.677987
TJS 10.323346
TMT 3.908216
TND 3.342846
TOP 2.688584
TRY 55.5938
TTD 7.605705
TWD 36.319598
TZS 2953.494355
UAH 51.091454
UGX 5013.576878
USD 1.116633
UYU 44.875855
UZS 13392.898528
VES 960.231858
VND 28842.073099
VUV 132.59261
WST 3.087188
XAF 655.957
XAG 0.020999
XAU 0.000278692495
XCD 3.017757
XCG 2.016855
XDR 0.789517
XOF 655.957
XPF 119.331742
YER 263.692886
ZAR 18.582253
ZMK 10051.016163
ZMW 22.5321
ZWL 359.555383
SSP 6415.840613
MXV 2.337735
  • CMSC

    0.0010

    19.601

    +0.01%

  • BCC

    -2.3000

    75.44

    -3.05%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    19.62

    -0.82%

  • RIO

    0.3000

    83.72

    +0.36%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    72.77

    0%

  • BTI

    0.6200

    60.1

    +1.03%

  • JRI

    0.1000

    10.85

    +0.92%

  • BCE

    -0.1500

    20.25

    -0.74%

  • NGG

    -0.0900

    81.77

    -0.11%

  • GSK

    0.3500

    51.1

    +0.68%

  • RELX

    -0.3600

    40.18

    -0.9%

  • AZN

    0.5700

    172.06

    +0.33%

  • RYCEF

    1.2100

    16.47

    +7.35%

  • VOD

    -0.0400

    15.7

    -0.25%

  • BP

    -0.7900

    50.53

    -1.56%

FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks
FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

FCNR(B) deposit drive puts sharper margin pressure on private banks

The aggressive mobilisation of Foreign Currency Non-Resident Bank [FCNR(B)] deposits increasingly weighed on bank margins during the September quarter, with private lenders bearing a disproportionate impact owing to their larger participation in the RBI’s FCNR(B) drive.

Text size:

The aggressive mobilisation of Foreign Currency Non-Resident Bank [FCNR(B)] deposits increasingly weighed on bank margins during the September quarter, with private lenders bearing a disproportionate impact owing to their larger participation in the RBI’s FCNR(B) drive.

A comparison of the September quarter earnings shows that private banks, despite reporting stronger loan and deposit growth, witnessed sharper compression in net interest margins (NIMs) than most public sector peers.

Among private banks, Kotak Mahindra Bank reported the steepest decline, with NIM falling 44 basis points year-on-year to 4.1%. Axis Bank’s NIM declined 37 basis points to 3.36%, while ICICI Bank’s margin slipped 12 basis points to 4.18%. HDFC Bank, the largest private lender, recorded a 14 basis point decline in NIM to 3.16%.

PSU resilience

In contrast, PSU banks displayed greater resilience. Union Bank of India reported NIM expansion of 19 basis points to 2.86%, while Central Bank of India’s margin improved 12 basis points to 3.01%. Bank of India’s NIM declined by a modest six basis points to 2.41%.

“The impact has been far more pronounced for private banks because their FCNR(B) mobilisation was significantly higher relative to their existing deposit base. While PSU banks mobilised FCNR(B) deposits equivalent to roughly 2-2.5% of deposits, private lenders such as ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank and Axis Bank raised FCNR(B) deposits amounting to about 7.5-10% of their deposit base. As a result, a larger pool of funds remained parked in lower-yielding assets pending deployment, leading to greater pressure on margins.” said Siddharth Rajpurohit, Lead Analyst - Banking and non-lending financials, Systematix Group.

“FCNR(B) inflows created a near-term pressure on margins as we carried excess liquidity during the quarter, said Ashok Vaswani, MD & CEO, Kotak Mahindra Bank during the media call. “The funds have been used to replace costlier borrowings and support growth opportunities. As the remaining liquidity is deployed into higher-yielding assets and repo-linked loans are repriced, we expect the margin impact to gradually moderate while NIMs remain broadly stable through the second half of the year,” he said.

Anshul Chandak, Head Treasury, RBL Bank, said the margin impact is temporary and reflects the cost of raising and hedging these deposits before they are fully deployed.

“From next quarter, you will start seeing improvement in NIMs,” Chandak said. He noted while FCNR(B) deposits initially weigh on margins because of their cost structure, the drag should ease as banks deploy the funds and balance sheets adjust.

Narrowing gap

For most banks, the impact is projected to normalise by the December quarter. However, lenders that raised FCNR(B) deposits disproportionately relative to their balance-sheet size could take longer to absorb the costs. Analysts expect the gap to narrow over the next two quarters as FCNR(B) funds are deployed and hedging costs stabilise. Until then, the banks that led the FCNR(B) mobilisation drive are likely to continue reporting a greater impact on margins than their state-owned peers.

“The FCNR(B)-related drag on margins is temporary,” said Rajpurohit. “Some impact could still persist in the December quarter as banks continue deploying these funds, but the pressure should start easing as the excess liquidity is put to work and repo-rate transmission normalises. By the fourth quarter, margins should largely stabilise, with the benefits of asset repricing and improved deployment of FCNR(B) funds helping offset the earlier drag,” he said.

Y.Havel--TPP